Literature DB >> 31960105

Manipulating sensory information: obstacle crossing strategies between typically developing children and young adults.

Victoria Rapos1, Michael Cinelli2.   

Abstract

Individuals constantly adapt their locomotion to navigate through complex environments. However, little known about anticipatory strategies used by children during adaptive locomotion. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of manipulating visual and somatosensory information during a multiple obstacle crossing task between children and adults. It was hypothesized that compared to young adults, children would have difficulty with anticipatory motor planning and online control during a multiple obstacle crossing task when sensory information was manipulated. Children (N = 16, [Formula: see text] = 9 ± 1.07 years) and young adults (N = 16, [Formula: see text] = 22 ± 0.96 years) walked along a 7 m pathway towards a goal while avoiding stepping on one, or two virtual obstacles placed 5 m from the start. Visual information regarding the number of obstacles was either presented at the start of steady-state locomotion, or two steps prior to the first obstacle. Each participant completed 36 trials, 18 on flat ground and 18 on foam terrain. Results indicated that in comparison to young adults, children's foot positions were significantly closer to the first obstacle when visual information about the obstacle was delayed. On flat ground, children demonstrated similar Trail foot positions relative to the first and second obstacles, suggesting children planned for the avoidance of the obstacles separately. On foam terrain, children performed similar to young adults, such that their Trail foot position relative to the first obstacle was significantly closer to the obstacle compared to their Trial foot position relative to the second obstacle. The results suggest that children plan for the avoidance of multiple obstacles differently compared to young adults. When stability is challenged, maintaining forward progression of locomotion overrides the planning of obstacle crossing, such that children perform similar to young adults. Therefore, it appears that children have difficulties with online control and anticipatory motor strategies during a multiple obstacle crossing task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Dynamic stability; Multi-sensory integration; Obstacle crossing; Visuo-motor control

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960105     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05732-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Anticipatory locomotor control for obstacle avoidance in mid-childhood aged children.

Authors:  B J McFadyen; F Malouin; F Dumas
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion.

Authors:  A. E. Patla; S. Rietdyk; C. Martin; S. Prentice
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The growth of stability: postural control from a development perspective.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; M H Woollacott
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  How does visual manipulation affect obstacle avoidance strategies used by athletes?

Authors:  M P Bijman; J J Fisher; L A Vallis
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.337

5.  Adaptations of walking pattern on a compliant surface to regulate dynamic stability.

Authors:  Michael J MacLellan; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion.

Authors:  Amir A Mohagheghi; Renato Moraes; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Characteristics of voluntary visual sampling of the environment for safe locomotion over different terrains.

Authors:  A E Patla; A Adkin; C Martin; R Holden; S Prentice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Children use different anticipatory control strategies than adults to circumvent an obstacle in the travel path.

Authors:  Lori Ann Vallis; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Stepping over an obstacle on a compliant travel surface reveals adaptive and maladaptive changes in locomotion patterns.

Authors:  Michael J MacLellan; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.