Literature DB >> 23747230

Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Kari L Loverro1, Nicole M Mueske, Kate A Hamel.   

Abstract

Minimum foot clearance (MFC) as it relates to trips and falls has been extensively studied across many locomotor tasks, but examination of this body of research yields several studies with conflicting results and a wide range of MFCs within tasks. While there are several factors that may affect the MFC variability across studies (populations studied, environmental conditions, etc.), one aspect of the discrepancies in the literature may be the result of different placements of shoe markers and/or MFC calculation methods. A marker on the toe is often used, but may only quantify one aspect of how the foot actually clears the trip hazard. The purpose of this study was to determine the location on the shoe where MFC occurs during locomotor tasks with the highest risk of tripping. Ten young adults performed three trials of locomotor tasks which included overground walking, obstacle crossing, level change and stair negotiation. Clearance was calculated for 72 points on each shoe, including those most commonly used in past research. The location of the overall MFC on the shoe sole differed both between limbs and across locomotor tasks. Additionally, the region of the obstacle, step or stair over which the MFC occurred varied both within and across task. Use of this 3D MFC methodology provided further insight into which portions of the shoe may come closest to the tripping hazard. Future research should examine whether the location and value of the MFC changes between different populations, or with environmental modifications.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimum foot clearance; Obstacles; Stairs; Steps; Tripping

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747230      PMCID: PMC3747961          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  30 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion.

Authors:  G P Austin; G E Garrett; R W Bohannon
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  W P Berg; H M Alessio; E M Mills; C Tong
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls.

Authors:  Rezaul Begg; Russell Best; Lisa Dell'Oro; Simon Taylor
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait.

Authors:  Mufadal A Moosabhoy; Steven A Gard
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Multifocal spectacles increase variability in toe clearance and risk of tripping in the elderly.

Authors:  Louise Johnson; John G Buckley; Andy J Scally; David B Elliott
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles.

Authors:  Catherine R Lowrey; Ashley Watson; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of ramp negotiation, paving type and shoe sole geometry on toe clearance in young adults.

Authors:  S B Thies; R K Jones; L P J Kenney; D Howard; R Baker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Gait characteristics of young and older individuals negotiating a raised surface: implications for the prevention of falls.

Authors:  R K Begg; W A Sparrow
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Characteristics of single and double obstacle avoidance strategies: a comparison between adults and children.

Authors:  Jessica R Berard; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Stepping performance during obstacle clearance in women: age differences and the association with lower extremity strength in older women.

Authors:  W P Berg; E R Blasi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effect of flip-flops on lower limb kinematics during walking: a cross-sectional study using three-dimensional gait analysis.

Authors:  T Sharpe; A Malone; H French; D Kiernan; T O'Brien
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Failures in adaptive locomotion: trial-and-error exploration to determine adequate foot elevation over obstacles.

Authors:  Michel J H Heijnen; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A new measure of trip risk integrating minimum foot clearance and dynamic stability across the swing phase of gait.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb.

Authors:  Michel J H Heijnen; Nathaniel L Romine; Dana M Stumpf; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Step length determines minimum toe clearance in older adults and people with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lisa Alcock; Brook Galna; Ruth Perkins; Sue Lord; Lynn Rochester
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Tripping Avoidance Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Based on Virtual Potential Field for Elderly People.

Authors:  Zongwei Zhang; Changle Li; Tianjiao Zheng; Hongwu Li; Sikai Zhao; Jie Zhao; Yanhe Zhu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Does Gait with an Ankle Foot Orthosis Improve or Compromise Minimum Foot Clearance?

Authors:  Pedro Fonseca; Leandro Machado; Manoela Vieira Sousa; Ricardo Sebastião; Filipa Sousa; Joana Figueiredo; Cristina P Santos; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.