Literature DB >> 16760781

Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability.

Alan T Villavicencio1, Sigita Burneikiene, Ketan R Bulsara, Jeffrey J Thramann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Multiple different approaches are used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease and spinal instability. Both anterior-posterior (AP) reconstructive surgery and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) provide a circumferential fusion and are considered reasonable surgical options. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess clinical parameters such as surgical blood loss, duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and complications for TLIF and AP reconstructive surgery for lumbar fusion.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was completed on 167 consecutive cases performed between January 2002 and March 2004. TLIF surgical procedure was performed on 124 patients, including 73 minimally invasive and 51 open cases. AP surgery was performed on 43 patients. Patients were treated for painful degenerative disc disease, facet arthropathy, degenerative instability, and spinal stenosis.
RESULTS: The mean operative time for AP reconstruction was 455 minutes, for minimally invasive TLIF 255 minutes, and open TLIF 222 minutes. The mean blood loss for AP fusion surgery was 550 mL, for minimally invasive TLIF 231 mL, and open TLIF 424 mL. The mean hospitalization time for AP reconstruction was 7.2 days, for minimally invasive TLIF 3.1 days, and open TLIF 4.1 days. The total rate of complications was 76.7% for AP reconstruction, including 62.8% major and 13.9% minor complications. The minimally invasive TLIF patients group had the total 30.1% rate of complications, 21.9% of which were minor and 8.2% major complications. There were no major complications in the open TLIF patients group, with 35.3% minor complications.
CONCLUSIONS: AP lumbar interbody fusion surgery is associated with a more than two times higher complication rate, significantly increased blood loss, and longer operative and hospitalization times than both percutaneous and open TLIF for lumbar disc degeneration and instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760781     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000185277.14484.4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  49 in total

1.  Correction of sagittal plane deformity and predictive factors for a favourable radiological outcome following multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion for mild degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Silviu Sabou; Tzu-Heng Jason Tseng; John Stephenson; Irfan Siddique; Rajat Verma; Saeed Mohammad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Visceral, vascular, and wound complications following over 13,000 lateral interbody fusions: a survey study and literature review.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Armen R Deukmedjian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Complications of the lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar interbody arthrodesis: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  D'Mitri A Sofianos; Michael R Briseño; Joshua Abrams; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.

Authors:  Xuyang Zhang; Hao Wu; Yilei Chen; Junhui Liu; Jian Chen; Teng Zhang; ZhaoFeng Zhou; Shunwu Fan; Patricia Dolan; Michael Anthony Adams; Fengdong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis].

Authors:  M Quante; H Kesten; A Richter; H Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Lumbar interbody fusion with utilization of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein: a retrospective real-life study about 277 patients.

Authors:  Stéphane Litrico; Tristan Langlais; Florent Pennes; Antoine Gennari; Philippe Paquis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Access related complications in anterior lumbar surgery performed by spinal surgeons.

Authors:  Nasir A Quraishi; M Konig; S J Booker; M Shafafy; B M Boszczyk; M P Grevitt; H Mehdian; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kristian Høy; Cody Bünger; Bent Niederman; Peter Helmig; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Haisheng Li; Thomas Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.