Literature DB >> 33226482

Importance of the epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery: a biomechanical study on cadaveric spines.

Xuyang Zhang1,2, Hao Wu3, Yilei Chen1,2, Junhui Liu1,2, Jian Chen1,2, Teng Zhang3, ZhaoFeng Zhou4, Shunwu Fan1,2, Patricia Dolan5, Michael Anthony Adams6, Fengdong Zhao7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: To explore the function of endplate epiphyseal ring in OLIF stand-alone surgery using a biomechanical model to reduce the complications of endplate collapse and cage subsidence.
METHODS: In total, 24 human cadaveric lumbar function units (L1-2 and L3-4 segments) were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group was implanted with long fusion cages which engaged with both inner and outer regions of epiphyseal ring (Complete Span-Epiphyseal Ring, CSER). Those engaged with only the inner half of epiphyseal ring were the second group (Half Span-Epiphyseal Ring, HSER). Each group was divided into two subgroups [higher cage-height (HH) and normal cage-height (NH)]. Specimens were fixed in testing cups and compressed at approximately 2.5 mm/s, until the first sign of structural failure. Trabecular structural damage was analyzed by Micro-CT, as well as the difference of bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) et al. in different regions.
RESULTS: Endplate collapse was mainly evident in the inner region of epiphyseal ring, where trabecular injury of sub-endplate bone was most concentrated. Endplate collapse incidence was significantly higher in HSER than CSER specimens (P = 0.017). A structural failure occurred at a lower force in HSER (1.41 ± 0.34 KN) compared with CSER (2.44 ± 0.59 KN). HH subgroups failed at a lower average force than NH subgroups. Micro-CT results showed a more extensive trabecular fracture in HSER specimens compared to CSER specimens, especially in HH subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Endplate collapse is more likely to occur with short half span cages than complete span cages, and taller cages compared with normal height cages. During OLIF surgery, we should choose cages matching intervertebral disc space height and place the cages spanning over the whole epiphyseal ring to improve support strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical model; Endplate collapse; Epiphyseal ring; OLIF; Stand-alone surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33226482     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06667-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

Review 1.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Brian Kwon; David Hanwuk Kim
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study.

Authors:  Yang-Hwei Tsuang; Yueh-Feng Chiang; Chih-Yi Hung; Hung-Wen Wei; Chang-Hung Huang; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  THE EFFECTS OF BONE MICROSTRUCTURE ON SUBSIDENCE RISK FOR ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, AND TLIF SPINE CAGES.

Authors:  Vivek Palepu; Melvin Helgeson; Michael Molyneaux-Francis; Srinidhi Nagaraja
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique.

Authors:  Zhong-You Zeng; Zhao-Wan Xu; Deng-Wei He; Xing Zhao; Wei-Hu Ma; Wen-Fei Ni; Yong-Xing Song; Jian-Qiao Zhang; Wei Yu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Zhi-Jie Zhou; Nan-Jian Xu; Wen-Jian Huang; Zhi-Chao Hu; Ai-Lian Wu; Jian-Fei Ji; Jian-Fu Han; Shun-Wu Fan; Feng-Dong Zhao; Hui Jin; Fei Pei; Shi-Yang Fan; De-Xiu Sui
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  The Impact of Cage Dimensions, Positioning, and Side of Approach in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Gernot Lang; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Moritz Perrech; Connor Berlin; Christoph P Hofstetter; Yu Moriguchi; Eric Elowitz; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 6.  Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Jia Xi Julian Li; Kevin Phan; Ralph Mobbs
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability as a result of different cage orientations: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Shih-Tien Wang; Vijay K Goel; Chong-Yau Fu; Shinichiro Kubo; Woosung Choi; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; J Kenneth Burkus; Jean-Charles LeHuec
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of Expandable and Fixed Interbody Cages in a Human Cadaver Corpectomy Model: Fatigue Characteristics.

Authors:  Murat Pekmezci; Jessica A Tang; Liu Cheng; Ashin Modak; Robert T McClellan; Jenni M Buckley; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Nitamar Abdala; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinicians' perceptions around discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a survey of orthopaedic and neuro-surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Xiaolong Chen; Uphar Chamoli; Harold Fogel; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Long Zhao; Jiancheng Zeng; Tianhang Xie; Xingxiao Pu; Yufei Lu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-08-15

3.  Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following oblique lumbar interbody fusion: A case report.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Hong; Moon-Soo Han; Jung-Kil Lee; Bong Ju Moon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Ke Gong; Yang Lin; Zhibin Wang; Feng Li; Wei Xiong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Anatomical characteristics affecting the surgical approach of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an MR-based observational study.

Authors:  Meng-Long Han; Wei-Hong He; Zhong-Yun He; Xue-Liang Yan; Xiang-Jun Fang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.