Literature DB >> 16759831

LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.

Peter Gill1, Amanda Kirkham, James Curran.   

Abstract

Previously, the interpretation of low copy number (LCN) STR profiles has been carried out using the biological or 'consensus' method-essentially, alleles are not reported, unless duplicated in separate PCR analyses [P. Gill, J. Whitaker, C. Flaxman, N. Brown, J. Buckleton, An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA, Forens. Sci. Int. 112 (2000) 17-40]. The method is now widely used throughout Europe. Although a probabilistic theory was simultaneously introduced, its time-consuming complexity meant that it could not be easily applied in practice. The 'consensus' method is not as efficient as the probabilistic approach, as the former wastes information in DNA profiles. However, the theory was subsequently extended to allow for DNA mixtures and population substructure in a programmed solution by Curran et al. [J.M. Curran, P. Gill, M.R. Bill, Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure, Forens. Sci. Int. 148 (2005) 47-53]. In this paper, we describe an expert interpretation system (LoComatioN) which removes this computational burden, and enables application of the full probabilistic method. This is the first expert system that can be used to rapidly evaluate numerous alternative explanations in a likelihood ratio approach, greatly facilitating court evaluation of the evidence. This would not be possible with manual calculation. Finally, the Gill et al. and Curran et al. papers both rely on the ability of the user to specify two quantities: the probability of allelic drop-out, and the probability of allelic contamination ("drop-in"). In this paper, we offer some guidelines on how these quantities may be specified.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16759831     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  13 in total

1.  Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFlSTR Identifiler.

Authors:  Theresa Caragine; Rebecca Mikulasovich; Jeannie Tamariz; Ewelina Bajda; James Sebestyen; Howard Baum; Mechthild Prinz
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  On the exact distribution of the numbers of alleles in DNA mixtures.

Authors:  Torben Tvedebrink
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.

Authors:  David J Balding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairs.

Authors:  Dennis McNevin; Janette Edson; James Robertson; Jeremy J Austin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 5.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  A ranking index for quality assessment of forensic DNA profiles forensic DNA profiles.

Authors:  Johannes Hedman; Ricky Ansell; Anders Nordgaard
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-11-09

7.  Low-template DNA: A single DNA analysis or two replicates?

Authors:  Simone Gittelson; Carolyn R Steffen; Michael D Coble
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Arthur J Eisenberg; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Comment on Kokshoorn, B, and Blankers, BJ 'Response to Grisedale, KS and van Daal, A: comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method'.

Authors:  Kelly Grisedale; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2013-01-03

10.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.