Literature DB >> 16758246

Comparison of imaging with FDG PET/CT with other imaging modalities in myeloma.

Richard J Breyer1, Michael E Mulligan, Stacy E Smith, Bruce R Line, Ashraf Z Badros.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of FDG PET/CT scanning in the management and staging of myeloma and to assess its strengths and limitations.
DESIGN: FDG PET/CT scans and all other available imaging studies were reviewed retrospectively from 16 consecutive patients by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians working in consensus. PATIENTS: The 16 patients had undergone a total of 19 FDG PET/CT scans. Radiographs were available in all cases, including 13 skeletal surveys; 25 CT scans (16 chest, three abdominal, four pelvic, one spine, one neck) and 22 MR imaging studies (17 spine, three pelvic, two extremity) also were reviewed. Patients' records were examined for relevant clinical information. All focal areas of abnormal FDG uptake were correlated with the other imaging studies to determine clinical significance. FDG PET/CT scans also were reviewed to see if small lesions shown on the other imaging studies could be identified in retrospect.
RESULTS: The 12 men and four women had an average age of 58 years (range 30-69 years). All 16 patients had an established diagnosis of multiple myeloma, with average duration of disease, from time of initial diagnosis to review, of 30 months (range 6 months to 11+ years). The FDG PET/CT scans revealed a total of 104 sites (90 in bone, 14 soft tissue) that were suspicious for neoplastic activity based on a standardized uptake value (SUV) greater than 2.5. Fifty-seven of these sites (55%) were new or previously undetected. The other imaging studies (X-ray, CT, MR) and clinical information confirmed the other 47 areas but also revealed 133 other small skeletal lesions. Six of these 133 additional lesions showed mild FDG uptake on re-review of the PET/CT scans. The FDG PET/CT findings led to management changes in 9/16 patients. MR imaging revealed five cases of diffuse bone involvement (four spine, one scapula) that were not evident by FDG PET/CT.
CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT scans are useful for the management and staging of myeloma. However, if PET/CT were the sole imaging study done, it would miss many additional small lytic skeletal lesions and could miss diffuse spine involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758246     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0127-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

Review 1.  Imaging techniques used in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of patients with myeloma.

Authors:  M E Mulligan
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Treated plasma cell lesions of bone with MRI signs of response to treatment: unexpected pathological findings.

Authors:  F E Lecouvet; P De Nayer; C Garbar; H Noël; J Malghem; B E Maldague; B C Vande Berg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Diagnostic utility of FDG PET in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Alan D Waxman; Allesandro D'Agnolo; Cindy M Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Value of FDG PET in the assessment of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Miriam A Bredella; Lynne Steinbach; Gary Caputo; George Segall; Randall Hawkins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Multiple myeloma: clinical features and indications for therapy.

Authors:  Angela Dispenzieri; Robert A Kyle
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival.

Authors:  B G Durie; S E Salmon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A comparison of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose PET and technetium-99m sestamibi in assessing patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  L Mileshkin; R Blum; J F Seymour; A Patrikeos; R J Hicks; H M Prince
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  The role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow up of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Nadia Withofs; Jens Hillengass; Paolo Simoni; Elena Zamagni; Roland Hustinx; Yves Beguin
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 2.  [Ankylosing spondylitis--current state of imaging including scoring methods].

Authors:  C E Althoff; K G Hermann; J Braun; J Sieper
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography in predicting survival in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rauf Haznedar; Sahika Z Akı; Ozgür U Akdemir; Zübeyde N Ozkurt; Ozcan Ceneli; Münci Yağcı; Gulsan T Sucak; Mustafa Unlü
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Nurhan Ergül; Hediye Ciftci; Güven Cetin; Sebnem Izmir Güner; Teyfik Fikret Cermik
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Clinical challenges of an oligosecretory plasma cell dyscrasia.

Authors:  Luís Rodrigues; Marta Neves; Helena Sá; Mário Campos
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-18

Review 6.  PET/CT and MR imaging in myeloma.

Authors:  Michael E Mulligan; Ashraf Z Badros
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Utility of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal imaging.

Authors:  Ammar A Chaudhry; Maryam Gul; Elaine Gould; Mathew Teng; Kevin Baker; Robert Matthews
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-28

8.  MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Frédéric E Lecouvet; Dimitar Boyadzhiev; Laurence Collette; Maude Berckmans; Nicolas Michoux; Perrine Triqueneaux; Vassiliki Pasoglou; François Jamar; Marie-Christiane Vekemans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Whole body MRI and PET/CT in haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Chieh Lin; Alain Luciani; Emmanuel Itti; Corinne Haioun; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.