Literature DB >> 16752602

Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning.

Dagmar Zeithamova1, W Todd Maddox.   

Abstract

The effect of a working-memory-demanding dual task on perceptual category learning was investigated. In Experiment 1, participants learned unidimensional rule-based or information integration category structures. In Experiment 2, participants learned a conjunctive rule-based category structure. In Experiment 1, unidimensional rule-based category learning was disrupted more by the dual working memory task than was information integration category learning. In addition, rule-based category learning differed qualitatively from information integration category learning in yielding a bimodal, rather than a normal, distribution of scores. Experiment 2 showed that rule-based learning can be disrupted by a dual working memory task even when both dimensions are relevant for optimal categorization. The results support the notion of at least two systems of category learning a hypothesis-testing system that seeks verbalizable rules and relies on working memory and selective attention, and an implicit system that is procedural-learning based and is essentially automatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16752602     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  37 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Kelli D Hejl; A David Ing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: the priority of holistic individuation.

Authors:  G Regehr; L R Brooks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1993-03

7.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test.

Authors:  C J Bench; C D Frith; P M Grasby; K J Friston; E Paulesu; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  Dopamine and synaptic plasticity in the neostriatum.

Authors:  G W Arbuthnott; C A Ingham; J R Wickens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  70 in total

1.  Computational Models Inform Clinical Science and Assessment: An Application to Category Learning in Striatal-Damaged Patients.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  The dimensionality of perceptual category learning: a state-trace analysis.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; John C Dunn; Michael Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

3.  Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 4.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  The role of visuospatial and verbal working memory in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Zeithamova; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  Initial training with difficult items facilitates information integration, but not rule-based category learning.

Authors:  Brian J Spiering; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

7.  The C957T polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D₂ gene modulates domain-general category learning.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Challenging the role of implicit processes in probabilistic category learning.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; David A Lagnado; David R Shanks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

9.  What is pressure? Evidence for social pressure as a type of regulatory focus.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  A Comparison of the neural correlates that underlie rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  Kathryn L Carpenter; Andy J Wills; Abdelmalek Benattayallah; Fraser Milton
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.