Literature DB >> 19293105

What is pressure? Evidence for social pressure as a type of regulatory focus.

Darrell A Worthy1, Arthur B Markman, W Todd Maddox.   

Abstract

Previous research (Markman, Maddox, & Worthy, 2006) suggests that pressure leads to choking when one is learning to classify items on the basis of an explicit rule, but it leads to excelling when one is learning to classify items on the basis of an implicit strategy. In this article, we relate social pressure to regulatory focus theory. We propose that the effects of pressure on performance arise because pressure induces a prevention focus that interacts with the more local reward structure of the task. To test this hypothesis, we repeated previous research, but using a losses reward structure, so that participants under pressure were in a regulatory fit. We also successfully replicated previous results by using a gains reward structure. In contrast with participants who attempted to maximize gains on each trial, participants who attempted to minimize losses choked on the implicit-learning task but excelled on the explicit-learning task. The results suggest a three-way interaction between pressure level, task type, and reward structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19293105      PMCID: PMC2658749          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; J Vincent Filoteo; Kelli D Hejl; A David Ing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  When high-powered people fail: working memory and "choking under pressure" in math.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-02

5.  Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Zeithamova; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

6.  A test of the regulatory fit hypothesis in perceptual classification learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Grant C Baldwin; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

7.  From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Marci S Decaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Beyond pleasure and pain.

Authors:  E T Higgins
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-12

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Differential Effects of Regulatory Fit on Category Learning.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox; Grant C Baldwin
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05
View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of musicality and motivational orientation on auditory category learning: a test of a regulatory-fit hypothesis.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Molly J Henry; Alan Wedd; Timothy J Pleskac; Joseph Cesario
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  When bad stress goes good: increased threat reactivity predicts improved category learning performance.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; Brandon Cosley; Shannon K McCoy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

3.  Performance Pressure Enhances Speech Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Seth Koslov; Han-Gyol Yi; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2015-12-23

4.  Limiting motor skill knowledge via incidental training protects against choking under pressure.

Authors:  Taraz G Lee; Daniel E Acuña; Konrad P Kording; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Marie K Krug; Kimberly S Chiew; Wouter Kool; J Andrew Westbrook; Nathan J Clement; R Alison Adcock; Deanna M Barch; Matthew M Botvinick; Charles S Carver; Roshan Cools; Ruud Custers; Anthony Dickinson; Carol S Dweck; Ayelet Fishbach; Peter M Gollwitzer; Thomas M Hess; Derek M Isaacowitz; Mara Mather; Kou Murayama; Luiz Pessoa; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Motivational Influences on Cognitive Performance in Children: Focus Over Fit.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Caitlin C Brez; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2011

7.  The Motivation-Cognition Interface in Learning and Decision-Making.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-01

8.  Feedback and stimulus-offset timing effects in perceptual category learning.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Stress, Time Pressure, Strategy Selection and Math Anxiety in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sara Caviola; Emma Carey; Irene C Mammarella; Denes Szucs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  "Lubricant" or "Stumbling Block"?: The Paradoxical Association Between Team Authoritarian Leadership and Creative Deviance.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Yong-Zhou Li; De-Qun Zhu; Jing-Zhi Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.