Literature DB >> 16751465

Purchaser strategies to influence quality of care: from rhetoric to global applications.

P McNamara1.   

Abstract

The potential of purchasers to influence the quality and safety of care has captured the attention of health sector leaders worldwide. Quality based purchasing explicitly seeks to hold providers accountable for the quality and safety of care. Three strategies are available to purchasers: (1) selective contracting based on quality; (2) payment differentials based on quality; and (3) sponsorship of comparative provider report cards. Examples are given to illustrate each of the three strategies. Governments, employers, social insurance funds, community based insurance organizations, health plans, donors, and other buyers of health services are encouraged to explore and debate these purchaser strategies within the context of an overarching national or local quality framework. Public and private funders of operations research are encouraged to support and disseminate evaluations of purchaser efforts to improve quality. This paper is designed to highlight and frame purchasers' strategies explicitly crafted to enhance the quality and safety of care. The ultimate aim is to encourage thoughtful discussion about whether or not one or more purchaser strategy might support a particular country's goals to improve care. Experiences from both developed and developing countries are included to facilitate the exchange of ideas and provide the broadest of perspectives.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751465      PMCID: PMC2464861          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  9 in total

Review 1.  Employers: quality takers or quality makers?

Authors:  I Fraser; P McNamara
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  The use of private-sector contracts for primary health care: theory, evidence and lessons for low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  N Palmer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Contracting for health services: an evaluation of recent reforms in Nicaragua.

Authors:  William Jack
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.344

4.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  Quality-based payment: six case examples.

Authors:  Peggy McNamara
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Provider-specific report cards: a tool for health sector accountability in developing countries.

Authors:  Peggy McNamara
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 3.344

8.  Research into purchasing health care: time to face the challenge.

Authors:  G de Wildt; R Bhopal; M Lavender
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Quality assessment and assurance in primary health care.

Authors:  M I Roemer; C Montoya-Aguilar
Journal:  WHO Offset Publ       Date:  1988
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines.

Authors:  Orville Solon; Kimberly Woo; Stella A Quimbo; Riti Shimkhada; Jhiedon Florentino; John W Peabody
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.