Literature DB >> 16431878

Provider-specific report cards: a tool for health sector accountability in developing countries.

Peggy McNamara1.   

Abstract

In most health care systems in most countries, providers are not adequately held accountable - by governments, purchasers, provider professional associations or civil society - for the quality of care. One approach to improve provider accountability that is being debated and implemented in a subset of developed countries and a smaller group of developing countries is provider-specific comparative performance reporting. This review discusses universal design options for report cards, summarizes the evidence base, presents developing country examples, reviews challenges and outlines implementation steps. The ultimate aim is to provoke thoughtful debate about if and how comparative performance reporting fits within a developing country's broader framework of strategies to promote quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16431878     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czj009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  15 in total

1.  Purchaser strategies to influence quality of care: from rhetoric to global applications.

Authors:  P McNamara
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

2.  Use of care management practices in small- and medium-sized physician groups: do public reporting of physician quality and financial incentives matter?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Daniel Maeng; Lawrence P Casalino; Diane Rittenhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method.

Authors:  Susan M Paddock
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Sassy Molyneux; Martin Atela; Vibian Angwenyi; Catherine Goodman
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Ideal and reality: do countries adopt and follow recommended procedures in comprehensive multiyear planning guidelines for national immunization programmes?

Authors:  Peter Mala; Patrick Zuber; Claudio Politi; Fred Paccaud
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Strategic partnering to improve community health worker programming and performance: features of a community-health system integrated approach.

Authors:  Joseph F Naimoli; Henry B Perry; John W Townsend; Diana E Frymus; James A McCaffery
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-09-01

7.  Public reporting improves antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in primary care: a matched-pair cluster-randomized trial in China.

Authors:  Lianping Yang; Chaojie Liu; Lijun Wang; Xi Yin; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-10-10

Review 8.  What can we learn on public accountability from non-health disciplines: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Sara Van Belle; Susannah H Mayhew
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Origin of Variation in Primary Care Process and Outcome Indicators: Patients, Professionals, Centers, and Health Districts.

Authors:  Juan F Orueta; Arturo García-Alvarez; Gonzalo Grandes; Roberto Nuño-Solinís
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Does public reporting influence antibiotic and injection prescribing to all patients? A cluster-randomized matched-pair trial in china.

Authors:  Chenxi Liu; Xinping Zhang; Xuan Wang; Xiaopeng Zhang; Jie Wan; Fangying Zhong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.