Literature DB >> 15046137

Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Meredith B Rosenthal1, Rushika Fernandopulle, HyunSook Ryu Song, Bruce Landon.   

Abstract

Paying health care providers to meet quality goals is an idea with widespread appeal, given the common perception that quality of care in the United States remains unacceptably low despite a decade of benchmarking and public reporting. There has been little critical analysis of the design of the current generation of quality incentive programs. In this paper we examine public reports of paying for quality over the past five years and assess each of the identified programs in terms of key design features, including the market share of payers, the structure of the reward system, the amount of revenue at stake, and the targeted domains of health care quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046137     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  79 in total

Review 1.  Competition in medical services and the quality of care: concepts and history.

Authors:  Mark V Pauly
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

2.  Health reforms as examples of multilevel interventions in cancer care.

Authors:  Ann B Flood; Mary L Fennell; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Chronic care improvement in primary care: evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Peter J Fagan; Alyson B Schuster; Cynthia Boyd; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Griswold; Shannon M E Murphy; Linda Dunbar; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The role of technology and the chronic care model.

Authors:  Linda M Siminerio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Higher Incentive Payments in Medicare Advantage's Pay-for-Performance Program Did Not Improve Quality But Did Increase Plan Offerings.

Authors:  Timothy J Layton; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Money can't buy you satisfaction.

Authors:  Chris Ham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-12

7.  Physician pay-for-performance. Implementation and research issues.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; David J Knutson; Roger S Mazze
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Is there any ideal of 'high quality care' opposing 'low quality care'? A deconstructionist reading.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow; Peter Adams
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-06

9.  Patients with multiple chronic conditions do not receive lower quality of preventive care.

Authors:  SeungJin Bae; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Selecting high priority quality measures for breast cancer quality improvement.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Rebecca Ottesen; Stephen B Edge; Michael A Bookman; Robert W Carlson; Richard L Theriault; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.