Literature DB >> 16751341

Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.

Daniel L Halligan1, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

Non-coding DNA comprises approximately 80% of the euchromatic portion of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Non-coding sequences are known to contain functionally important elements controlling gene expression, but the proportion of sites that are selectively constrained is still largely unknown. We have compared the complete D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans genome sequences to estimate mean selective constraint (the fraction of mutations that are eliminated by selection) in coding and non-coding DNA by standardizing to substitution rates in putatively unconstrained sequences. We show that constraint is positively correlated with intronic and intergenic sequence length and is generally remarkably strong in non-coding DNA, implying that more than half of all point mutations in the Drosophila genome are deleterious. This fraction is also likely to be an underestimate if many substitutions in non-coding DNA are adaptively driven to fixation. We also show that substitutions in long introns and intergenic sequences are clustered, such that there is an excess of substitutions <8 bp apart and a deficit farther apart. These results suggest that there are blocks of constrained nucleotides, presumably involved in gene expression control, that are concentrated in long non-coding sequences. Furthermore, we infer that there is more than three times as much functional non-coding DNA as protein-coding DNA in the Drosophila genome. Most deleterious mutations therefore occur in non-coding DNA, and these may make an important contribution to a wide variety of evolutionary processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751341      PMCID: PMC1484454          DOI: 10.1101/gr.5022906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  56 in total

Review 1.  Insertion-deletion biases and the evolution of genome size.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Patterns of insertion and deletion in contrasting chromatin domains.

Authors:  Justin P Blumenstiel; Daniel L Hartl; Elena R Lozovsky
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  MCALIGN: stochastic alignment of noncoding DNA sequences based on an evolutionary model of sequence evolution.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Toby Johnson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences.

Authors:  S M Mount; C Burks; G Hertz; G D Stormo; O White; C Fields
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Insertion/deletion and nucleotide polymorphism data reveal constraints in Drosophila melanogaster introns and intergenic regions.

Authors:  Lino Ometto; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The genetic organization of chromosomes.

Authors:  C A Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Effects of intron length on differential processing of mouse mu heavy-chain mRNA.

Authors:  N Tsurushita; L J Korn
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Susan E Ptak; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Identification of pseudogenes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Duncan Milburn; Zhaolei Zhang; Paul Bertone; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  125 in total

Review 1.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Changes in selective effects over time facilitate turnover of enhancer sequences.

Authors:  Kevin Bullaughey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Drosophila Genomes by the Baker's Dozen. Preface.

Authors:  Michael Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Universal patterns of purifying selection at noncoding positions in bacteria.

Authors:  Nacho Molina; Erik van Nimwegen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A burst of protein sequence evolution and a prolonged period of asymmetric evolution follow gene duplication in yeast.

Authors:  Devin R Scannell; Kenneth H Wolfe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Saurabh Asthana; William S Noble; Gregory Kryukov; Charles E Grant; Shamil Sunyaev; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  An overview of the introns-first theory.

Authors:  David Penny; Marc P Hoeppner; Anthony M Poole; Daniel C Jeffares
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Steffen Beisswanger; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.