Literature DB >> 12454069

How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster.

Susan E Ptak1, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Studies of "dead-on-arrival" transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster found that deletions outnumber insertions approximately 8:1 with a median size for deletions of approximately 10 bp. These results are consistent with the deletion and insertion profiles found in most other Drosophila pseudogenes. In contrast, a recent study of D. melanogaster introns found a deletion/insertion ratio of 1.35:1, with 84% of deletions being shorter than 10 bp. This discrepancy could be explained if deletions, especially long deletions, are more frequently strongly deleterious than insertions and are eliminated disproportionately from intron sequences. To test this possibility, we use analysis and simulations to examine how deletions and insertions of different lengths affect different components of splicing and determine the distribution of deletions and insertions that preserve the original exons. We find that, consistent with our predictions, longer deletions affect splicing at a much higher rate compared to insertions and short deletions. We also explore other potential constraints in introns and show that most of these also disproportionately affect large deletions. Altogether we demonstrate that constraints in introns may explain much of the difference in the pattern of deletions and insertions observed in Drosophila introns and pseudogenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454069      PMCID: PMC1462315     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

1.  Intron size and natural selection.

Authors:  A B Carvalho; A G Clark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome.

Authors:  D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size.

Authors:  D A Petrov; T A Sangster; J S Johnston; D L Hartl; K L Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evidence for splice site pairing via intron definition in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  C M Romfo; C J Alvarez; W J van Heeckeren; C J Webb; J A Wise
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Intron-exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms.

Authors:  M Deutsch; M Long
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The evolution of an alpha-esterase pseudogene inactivated in the Drosophila melanogaster lineage.

Authors:  G C Robin; R J Russell; D J Cutler; J G Oakeshott
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Intron-genome size relationship on a large evolutionary scale.

Authors:  A E Vinogradov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.

Authors:  J M Comeron; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Molecular evolution of the Cecropin multigene family in Drosophila. functional genes vs. pseudogenes.

Authors:  S Ramos-Onsins; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  DNA repair in Drosophila: insights from the Drosophila genome sequence.

Authors:  J J Sekelsky; M H Brodsky; K C Burtis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  10 in total

1.  Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison.

Authors:  Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Insertion/deletion and nucleotide polymorphism data reveal constraints in Drosophila melanogaster introns and intergenic regions.

Authors:  Lino Ometto; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  John Parsch; Sergey Novozhilov; Sarah S Saminadin-Peter; Karen M Wong; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John Parsch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rapid Generation of Human Genetic Loss-of-Function iPSC Lines by Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Editing.

Authors:  Andrew M Tidball; Louis T Dang; Trevor W Glenn; Emma G Kilbane; Daniel J Klarr; Joshua L Margolis; Michael D Uhler; Jack M Parent
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 7.765

7.  Benchmarking tools for the alignment of functional noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Daniel A Pollard; Casey M Bergman; Jens Stoye; Susan E Celniker; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The regulatory content of intergenic DNA shapes genome architecture.

Authors:  Craig E Nelson; Bradley M Hersh; Sean B Carroll
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  New Methods for Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects for INDELs and SNPs.

Authors:  Henry J Barton; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Intron and gene size expansion during nervous system evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J McCoy; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.