Literature DB >> 16750783

Occupational radiation dose associated with Rb-82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography imaging.

A Robert Schleipman1, Frank P Castronovo, Marcelo F Di Carli, Sharmila Dorbala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We determined staff radiation dose during rest and stress rubidium 82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients received 1,587 +/- 163 MBq (42.9 +/- 4.4 mCi) Rb-82 during rest or pharmacologic stress. A pressurized ion chamber was used to monitor radiation exposure in 50 examinations. For comparison, staff exposure during pharmacologic stress in 20 other patients receiving 1,204 +/- 55.5 MBq (32.54 +/- 1.5 mCi) technetium 99m 2-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) was measured. For Rb-82 infusion and PET acquisition, the mean dose was 0.45 +/- 0.25 microSv (0.045 +/- 0.025 mrem). Exposure for routine stress testing at variable distances from the patient was equivalent to background. Similar exposure for pharmacologic stress testing through 7 minutes after injection of Tc-99m MIBI at variable distances was 1.075 +/- 0.32 microSv (0.108 +/- 0.03 mrem). However, exposure for stress tests starting 7 minutes after Rb-82 infusion at 0.5 m was estimated at 0.4 microSv (0.04 mrem). To determine the potential radiation dose for those responding to a medical emergency or otherwise in close proximity to a patient, we measured the mean cumulative dose at 0.5 m from 0 to 7 minutes of Rb-82 infusion, which resulted in 19.1 +/- 5.8 microSv (1.9 +/- 0.58 mrem).
CONCLUSIONS: Radiation doses for all tasks during routine Rb-82 stress-rest PET are lower than measured Tc-99m MIBI values. However, the radiation dose in close proximity to the patient during or immediately after Rb-82 infusion can be considerably higher, underscoring the need for strict attention to source distance and contact times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16750783     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  13 in total

Review 1.  Artifacts in planar and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  F J Wackers
Journal:  Am J Card Imaging       Date:  1992-03

2.  Are MIBI/tetrofosmin heart studies a potential radiation hazard to technologists?

Authors:  E A Clarke; A Notghi; L K Harding
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.

Authors:  Fiona O Roberts; Dishan H Gunawardana; Kunthi Pathmaraj; Anthony Wallace; Paul L U; Tian Mi; Sam U Berlangieri; Graeme J O'Keefe; Chris C Rowe; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2005-03

Review 4.  ACC expert consensus document. Radiation safety in the practice of cardiology. American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  M C Limacher; P S Douglas; G Germano; W K Laskey; B D Lindsay; M H McKetty; M E Moore; J K Park; F M Prigent; M N Walsh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Radiation safety considerations for PET centers.

Authors:  T F Brown; N J Yasillo
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  1997-06

6.  Radiation dose rates from patients undergoing PET: implications for technologists and waiting areas.

Authors:  N A Benatar; B F Cronin; M J O'Doherty
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-05

7.  Radiation dose to technicians per nuclear medicine procedure: comparison between technetium-99m, gallium-67, and iodine-131 radiotracers and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose.

Authors:  C Chiesa; V De Sanctis; F Crippa; M Schiavini; C E Fraigola; A Bogni; C Pascali; D Decise; R Marchesini; E Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-11

8.  Evaluation of equivalent dose to working staff with oxygen-15-water in positron emission tomographic studies.

Authors:  T H Wu; R S Liu; N S Chong; C S Tsai; J S Lee
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Task-specific monitoring of nuclear medicine technologists' radiation exposure.

Authors:  Richard Smart
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 10.  Cardiac positron emission tomography and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe--a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  D Le Guludec; R Lautamäki; J Knuuti; J J Bax; F M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.

Authors:  John O Prior; Gilles Allenbach; Ines Valenta; Marek Kosinski; Cyrill Burger; Francis R Verdun; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).

Authors:  Albert Flotats; Juhani Knuuti; Matthias Gutberlet; Claudio Marcassa; Frank M Bengel; Philippe A Kaufmann; Michael R Rees; Birger Hesse
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Cardiac 82Rubidium PET/CT: initial European experience.

Authors:  Ashley M Groves; Marie-Elsya Speechly-Dick; John C Dickson; Irfan Kayani; Raymondo Endozo; Patty Blanchard; Manu Shastry; Elizabeth Prvulovich; Wendy A Waddington; Simona Ben-Haim; Jamshed B Bomanji; Jean R McEwan; Peter J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Adam A Ghotbi; Andreas Kjaer; Philip Hasbak
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.273

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.