Literature DB >> 9259531

Are MIBI/tetrofosmin heart studies a potential radiation hazard to technologists?

E A Clarke1, A Notghi, L K Harding.   

Abstract

The number of nuclear medicine studies is increasing and they are becoming more complex and time-consuming. In particular, this is true of myocardial perfusion investigations. We use a one-day protocol for these studies, utilizing 99Tc(m)-MIBI or 99Tc(m)-tetrofosmin with tomographic rest images (250 MBq) acquired in the morning and exercise images (750 MBq) approximately 4 h later after pharmacological stress. Imaging technologists are concerned about continual exposure to 1000 MBq 99Tc(m) per study. Radiation doses were measured during rest (1.0 microSv, n = 18), exercise (2.5 microSv, n = 18) and stress administration (2.0 microSv, n = 16), giving a total dose of 5.5 microSv per combined cardiac study. We have previously shown that the average dose per radionuclide study (excluding myocardial perfusion studies) is 1.5 microSv. Although 5.5 microSv is higher, a technologist is highly unlikely to exceed current dose limits. New EC legislation, however, is expected to reduce these limits, which may lead to more classified workers. Pregnant technologists should avoid, if possible, combined cardiac studies, especially if performing other nuclear medicine duties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9259531     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199706000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  4 in total

1.  Occupational radiation dose associated with Rb-82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  A Robert Schleipman; Frank P Castronovo; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Acute myocardial infarction in the obstetric patient.

Authors:  Tabassum Firoz; Laura A Magee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2012-03-22

3.  Importance of bladder radioactivity for radiation safety in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Salih Sinan Gültekin; Turan Sahmaran
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2013-12-10

Review 4.  Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Adam A Ghotbi; Andreas Kjaer; Philip Hasbak
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.273

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.