Literature DB >> 15261128

Cardiac positron emission tomography and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress.

Timothy M Bateman1.   

Abstract

Although single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides excellent diagnostic and prognostic value in the evaluation of coronary artery disease, its progress has slowed relative to emerging modalities, such as cardiac positron emission tomography (PET). PET imaging provides certain advantages versus SPECT, including higher spatial resolution, improved attenuation correction, and the capability to perform quantitative measurements at the peak of stress. Cardiac PET scanning is a well-validated, reimbursable means to noninvasively assess myocardial perfusion, left ventricular function, and viability by dynamically imaging positron-labeled radiopharmaceuticals in vivo. For the stress portion of rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET protocols, pharmacologic agents are commonly used because of the short half-life of Rb-82. In light of recent advances in cardiac PET equipment, the expansion of PET/computed tomography scanners, and the resulting potential for streamlined protocols, adenosine may become widely used in electrocardiographic-gated rest-stress acquisition protocols with Rb-82 cardiac PET. With the resolution of technical issues, cardiac PET has an opportunity to become the standard for evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the coming years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15261128     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

1.  Occupational radiation dose associated with Rb-82 myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  A Robert Schleipman; Frank P Castronovo; Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Investigation of emission-transmission misalignment artifacts on rubidium-82 cardiac PET with adenosine pharmacologic stress.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Raghuveer K Halkar; Fabio P Esteves; Ernest V Garcia; C David Cooke; Mushabbar A Syed; F DuBois Bowman; John R Votaw
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Reconstruction of rapidly acquired Germanium-68 transmission scans for cardiac PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Bai-Ling Hsu; James A Case; Kevin W Moser; Timothy M Bateman; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Searching for novel PET radiotracers: imaging cardiac perfusion, metabolism and inflammation.

Authors:  Caitlund Q Davidson; Christopher P Phenix; T C Tai; Neelam Khaper; Simon J Lees
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 6.  Moving into the next era of PET myocardial perfusion imaging: introduction of novel 18F-labeled tracers.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Xinyu Chen; Steven P Rowe; Constantin Lapa; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.