Literature DB >> 12958679

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

J M McGreevy1, P P Goodney, C M Birkmeyer, S R G Finlayson, W S Laycock, J D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although ventral hernia repair is increasingly performed laparoscopically, complication rates with this procedure are not well characterized. For this reason, we performed a prospective study comparing early outcomes after laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.
METHODS: We identified all the patients undergoing ventral (including incisional) hernia repair at a single tertiary care center between September 1, 1999 and July 1, 2001 (overall n = 257). To increase the homogeneity of the sample, we excluded umbilical hernia repairs, parastomal hernia repairs, nonelective procedures, procedures not involving mesh, and repairs performed concurrently with another surgical procedure. Postoperative complications (in-hospital or within 30-days) were assessed prospectively according to standardized definitions by trained nurse clinicians.
RESULTS: Of the 136 ventral hernia repairs that met the study criteria, 65 (48%) were laparoscopic repairs (including 3 conversions to open surgery) and 71 (52%) were open repairs. The patients in the laparoscopic group were more likely to have undergone a prior (failed) ventral hernia repair (40% vs 27%; p = 0.14), but other patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, fewer complications were experienced by patients undergoing laparoscopic repair (8% vs 21%; p = 0.03). The higher complication rate in the open ventral hernia repair group came from wound infections (8%) and postoperative ileus (4%), neither of which was observed in the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. The laparoscopic group had longer operating room times (2.2 vs 1.7 h; p = 0.001), and there was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter hospital stays with laparoscopic repair (1.1 vs 1.5 days; p = 0.10).
CONCLUSIONS: The patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had fewer postoperative complications than those receiving open repair. Wound infections and postoperative ileus accounted for the higher complication rates in the open ventral hernia repair group. Otherwise, these groups were very similar. Long-term studies assessing hernia recurrence rates will be required to help determine the optimal approach to ventral hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12958679     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8851-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  A case controlled study of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  R Chari; V Chari; M Eisenstat; R Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia.

Authors:  R W Luijendijk; W C Hop; M P van den Tol; D C de Lange; M M Braaksma; J N IJzermans; R U Boelhouwer; B C de Vries; M K Salu; J C Wereldsma; C M Bruijninckx; J Jeekel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  B T Heniford; B J Ramshaw
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair.

Authors:  E J DeMaria; J M Moss; H J Sugerman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces wound complications.

Authors:  S B Robbins; W E Pofahl; R P Gonzalez
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 6.  Ventral hernia repair by the laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  G M Larson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernioplasty.

Authors:  M D Holzman; C M Purut; K Reintgen; S Eubanks; T N Pappas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  B J Ramshaw; P Esartia; J Schwab; E M Mason; R A Wilson; T D Duncan; J Miller; G W Lucas; J Promes
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh.

Authors:  M A Carbajo; J C Martín del Olmo; J I Blanco; C de la Cuesta; M Toledano; F Martin; C Vaquero; L Inglada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a comparison study.

Authors:  A Park; D W Birch; P Lovrics
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  57 in total

1.  Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; K M LaPerle; D L Fowler
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  A retrospective audit comparing outcomes of open versus laparoscopic repair of umbilical/paraumbilical herniae.

Authors:  T A Solomon; Padma Wignesvaran; Mohammed A Chaudry; Matthew G Tutton
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Francisco Asencio; Javier Aguiló; Salvador Peiró; Juan Carbó; Ramón Ferri; Federico Caro; Marwan Ahmad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model.

Authors:  N B Zinther; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Stephanie Roll; Meik Friedrich; Juergen Zieren; Thomas Reinhold; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg; Wolfgang Greiner; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Nuttall technique: A method for subumbilical incisional hernia repair revised.

Authors:  Antonios-Apostolos K Tentes; Athanasios I Xanthoulis; Charalambos G Mirelis; Ioannis G Bougioukas; Evanthia G Tsalkidou; Konstantina A Bekiaridou; Odysseas S Korakianitis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat.

Authors:  Alexander H Petter-Puchner; R Fortelny; R Mittermayr; W Ohlinger; H Redl
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Challenges of giant ventral hernia repair in children in an African tertiary care center with limited resources.

Authors:  O D Osifo; A C Efobi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clarabelle T Pham; Caryn L Perera; D Scott Watkin; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Amrit Pal Singh Bedi; Tahir Bhatti; Alla Amin; Jamal Zuberi
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.