Literature DB >> 26890039

Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response.

Joseph M Aamodt1, David W Grainger2.   

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) collectively represents a class of naturally derived proteinaceous biomaterials purified from harvested organs and tissues with increasing scientific focus and utility in tissue engineering and repair. This interest stems predominantly from the largely unproven concept that processed ECM biomaterials as natural tissue-derived matrices better integrate with host tissue than purely synthetic biomaterials. Nearly every tissue type has been decellularized and processed for re-use as tissue-derived ECM protein implants and scaffolds. To date, however, little consensus exists for defining ECM compositions or sources that best constitute decellularized biomaterials that might better heal, integrate with host tissues and avoid the foreign body response (FBR). Metrics used to assess ECM performance in biomaterial implants are arbitrary and contextually specific by convention. Few comparisons for in vivo host responses to ECM implants from different sources are published. This review discusses current ECM-derived biomaterials characterization methods including relationships between ECM material compositions from different sources, properties and host tissue response as implants. Relevant preclinical in vivo models are compared along with their associated advantages and limitations, and the current state of various metrics used to define material integration and biocompatibility are discussed. Commonly applied applications of these ECM-derived biomaterials as stand-alone implanted matrices and devices are compared with respect to host tissue responses.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decellularized; ECM; Implants; Integration; Protein scaffolds; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26890039      PMCID: PMC4785021          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  185 in total

1.  Coating of titanium implants with type-I collagen.

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Eva Schulze; Ricardo Bernhardt; Uwe Hanisch; Dieter Scharnweber; Hartmut Worch; Hans Zwipp; Achim Biewener
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; John M Freund; Li Han; J Peter Rubin; Janet E Reing; Eric M Jeffries; Mathew T Wolf; Stephen Tottey; Christopher A Barnes; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Smart materials as scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Francesco Rosso; Gerardo Marino; Antonio Giordano; Manlio Barbarisi; Domenico Parmeggiani; Alfonso Barbarisi
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Single factors direct the differentiation of stem cells from the fetal and adult central nervous system.

Authors:  K K Johe; T G Hazel; T Muller; M M Dugich-Djordjevic; R D McKay
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Short duration gluteraldehyde cross linking of decellularized bovine pericardium improves biological response.

Authors:  P R Umashankar; T Arun; T V Kumari
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  The foreign body reaction: a chronic inflammatory response.

Authors:  D L Coleman; R N King; J D Andrade
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1974-09

7.  The pivotal role of fibrocytes and mast cells in mediating fibrotic reactions to biomaterials.

Authors:  Paul T Thevenot; David W Baker; Hong Weng; Man-Wu Sun; Liping Tang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Macrophages ingest and are activated by bacterial DNA.

Authors:  K J Stacey; M J Sweet; D A Hume
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Maja L Konstantinovic; Pieter Lagae; Fang Zheng; Eric K Verbeken; Dirk De Ridder; Jan A Deprest
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  75 in total

1.  Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications.

Authors:  Jiajia Xue; Tong Wu; Yunqian Dai; Younan Xia
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Modulation of Inflammatory Response to Implanted Biomaterials Using Natural Compounds.

Authors:  Maria Yanez; James Blanchette; Ehsan Jabbarzadeh
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.116

3.  Chemical functionality of multidomain peptide hydrogels governs early host immune response.

Authors:  Tania L Lopez-Silva; David G Leach; Alon Azares; I-Che Li; Darren G Woodside; Jeffrey D Hartgerink
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Long-term retention of ECM hydrogel after implantation into a sub-acute stroke cavity reduces lesion volume.

Authors:  Harmanvir Ghuman; Madeline Gerwig; Francesca J Nicholls; Jessie R Liu; Julia Donnelly; Stephen F Badylak; Michel Modo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment.

Authors:  Guoyou Huang; Fei Li; Xin Zhao; Yufei Ma; Yuhui Li; Min Lin; Guorui Jin; Tian Jian Lu; Guy M Genin; Feng Xu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Role of Region-Specific Brain Decellularized Extracellular Matrix on In Vitro Neuronal Maturation.

Authors:  Diego Reginensi; Didio Ortiz; Andrea Pravia; Andrea Burillo; Félix Morales; Carly Morgan; Lindsay Jimenez; Kunjan R Dave; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon; Rolando A Gittens
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

Authors:  Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Wanjun Liu; Andrea Jimenez; Jingzhou Yang; Ali Akpek; Xiao Liu; Qingmeng Pi; Xuan Mu; Ning Hu; Raymond Michel Schiffelers; Jai Prakash; Jingwei Xie; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 8.  3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration.

Authors:  Haitao Cui; Margaret Nowicki; John P Fisher; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  Bottom-up approaches in synthetic biology and biomaterials for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Mitchell S Weisenberger; Tara L Deans
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Decellularized materials derived from TSP2-KO mice promote enhanced neovascularization and integration in diabetic wounds.

Authors:  Aaron H Morris; Danielle K Stamer; Britta Kunkemoeller; Julie Chang; Hao Xing; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.