Literature DB >> 16736372

Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.

Denis Nash1, Sulaiman Azeez, David Vlahov, Melissa Schori.   

Abstract

Only 50% of New Yorkers aged 50 and over reported ever being screened for colorectal cancer by any modality according to a recent household survey. The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of a hospital-based intervention aimed at eliminating health care system barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening at Lincoln Medical Center, a large, urban public hospital in one of the nation's poorest census tracts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all colonoscopies performed over an 11-month period, during which a multi-pronged intervention to increase the number of screening colonoscopies took place. Two "patient navigators" were hired during the study period to provide continuity for colonoscopy patients. A Direct Endoscopic Referral System (DERS) was also implemented. Enhancements to the gastrointestinal (GI) suite were also made to improve operational efficiency. Immediately following the introduction of the patient navigators, there was a dramatic and sustained decline in the broken appointment rates for both screening and diagnostic colonoscopy (from 67% in May of 2003 to 5% in June of 2003). The likelihood of keeping the appointment for colonoscopy after the patient navigator intervention increased by nearly 3-fold (relative risk = 2.6, 95% CI 2.2-3.0). The rate of screening colonoscopies increased from 56.8 per month to 119 per month. The screening colonoscopy coverage provided by this facility among persons aged 50 and over in surrounding Zip codes increased from 5.2 to 15.6% (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.7). Efforts to increase the number of screening colonoscopies were highly successful, due in large part to the influence of patient navigators, a streamlined referral system, and GI suite enhancements. These findings suggest that there are significant health-care system barriers to colonoscopy that, when addressed, could have a significant impact on screening colonoscopy rates in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736372      PMCID: PMC2527164          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9029-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  15 in total

1.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Invited commentary: places, people, and health.

Authors:  Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature.

Authors:  I H Yen; S L Syme
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987-2000).

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; David E Nelson; Helen I Meissner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in screening for colon cancer: report from the New York Cancer Project.

Authors:  David Vlahov; Jennifer Ahern; Tara Vazquez; Stephen Johnson; Laura A Philips; Denis Nash; Maria K Mitchell; Harold Freeman
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: the case of five developed countries.

Authors:  S Singh; J E Darroch; J J Frost
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

7.  Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  P O'Campo; X Xue; M C Wang; M Caughy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A V Diez Roux; S S Merkin; D Arnett; L Chambless; M Massing; F J Nieto; P Sorlie; M Szklo; H A Tyroler; R L Watson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  T Byers; B Levin; D Rothenberger; G D Dodd; R A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  72 in total

1.  Strategies used and challenges faced by a breast cancer patient navigator in an urban underserved community.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Justine Wu; Barbara Dicicco-Bloom
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Multilevel interventions and racial/ethnic health disparities.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Hoda Badr; Paul Krebs; Irene Prabhu Das
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

3.  Navigating cancer care and research.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Effect of a patient navigator program on the volume and quality of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Human papillomavirus vaccine intentions among men participating in a human papillomavirus natural history study versus a comparison sample.

Authors:  Ellen M Daley; Stephanie L Marhefka; Eric R Buhi; Cheryl A Vamos; Natalie D Hernandez; Anna R Giuliano
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support.

Authors:  Barbara J Turner; Mark Weiner; Sheila D Berry; Karen Lillie; Kevin Fosnocht; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Community-Based, Preclinical Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Black Men Recruited From Barbershops: The MISTER B Trial.

Authors:  Helen Cole; Hayley S Thompson; Marilyn White; Ruth Browne; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Scott Braithwaite; Kevin Fiscella; Carla Boutin-Foster; Joseph Ravenell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Training in Patient Navigation: A Review of the Research Literature.

Authors:  Amy E Ustjanauskas; Marissa Bredice; Sumayah Nuhaily; Lisa Kath; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-12-08

10.  Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Adana A Llanos; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Chul-joo Lee; Mira L Katz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.