Literature DB >> 33034511

Resorbable Pins to Enhance Scaffold Retention in a Porcine Chondral Defect Model.

Jay M Patel1,2, Mackenzie L Sennett1,2,3, Anthony R Martin1,2,4, Kamiel S Saleh1,2, Michael R Eby1, Blair S Ashley1, Liane M Miller1,2, George R Dodge1,2, Jason A Burdick1,2,5, James L Carey1, Robert L Mauck1,2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cartilage repair strategies have seen improvement in recent years, especially with the use of scaffolds that serve as a template for cartilage formation. However, current fixation strategies are inconsistent with regards to retention, may be technically challenging, or may damage adjacent tissues or the implant itself. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate the retention and repair potential of cartilage scaffolds fixed with an easy-to-implement bioresorbable pin.
DESIGN: Electrospun hyaluronic acid scaffolds were implanted into trochlear groove defects in 3 juvenile and 3 adult pigs to evaluate short-term retention (2 weeks; pin fixation vs. press-fit and fibrin fixation) and long-term repair (8 months; scaffold vs. microfracture), respectively.
RESULTS: For the retention study, press-fit and fibrin fixation resulted in short-term scaffold dislodgment (n = 2 each), whereas pin fixation retained all scaffolds that were implanted (n = 6). Pin fixation did not cause any damage to the opposing patellar surface, and only minor changes in the subchondral bone were observed. For long-term repair, no differences were observed between microfracture and scaffold groups, in terms of second-look arthroscopy and indentation testing. On closer visualization with micro computed tomography and histology, a high degree of variability was observed between animals with regard to subchondral bone changes and cartilage repair quality, yet each Scaffold repair displayed similar properties to its matched microfracture control.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pin fixation did not cause adverse events in either the short- or the long-term relative to controls, indicating that pin fixation successfully retained scaffolds within defects without inhibiting repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; cartilage; fixation; microfracture; subchondral bone

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33034511      PMCID: PMC8804863          DOI: 10.1177/1947603520962568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  53 in total

1.  Minced cartilage without cell culture serves as an effective intraoperative cell source for cartilage repair.

Authors:  Yiling Lu; Sridevi Dhanaraj; Ziwei Wang; Dino M Bradley; Steven M Bowman; Brian J Cole; Francois Binette
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  W Laupattarakasem; M Laopaiboon; P Laupattarakasem; C Sumananont
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

3.  Evaluation of the 96/4 PLDLLA polymer resorbable lumbar interbody cage in a long term animal model.

Authors:  Jean Y Lazennec; Abdallah Madi; Marc A Rousseau; Bernard Roger; Gérard Saillant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bioactive factors for cartilage repair and regeneration: Improving delivery, retention, and activity.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Kamiel S Saleh; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Articular cartilage repair using a tissue-engineered cartilage-like implant: an animal study.

Authors:  P Mainil-Varlet; F Rieser; S Grogan; W Mueller; C Saager; R P Jakob
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Surgical interventions (microfracture, drilling, mosaicplasty, and allograft transplantation) for treating isolated cartilage defects of the knee in adults.

Authors:  Guilherme C Gracitelli; Vinícius Y Moraes; Carlos Es Franciozi; Marcus V Luzo; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-03

7.  Gradients with depth in electrospun fibrous scaffolds for directed cell behavior.

Authors:  Harini G Sundararaghavan; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Fibrous Scaffolds with Varied Fiber Chemistry and Growth Factor Delivery Promote Repair in a Porcine Cartilage Defect Model.

Authors:  Iris L Kim; Christian G Pfeifer; Matthew B Fisher; Vishal Saxena; Gregory R Meloni; Mi Y Kwon; Minwook Kim; David R Steinberg; Robert L Mauck; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study.

Authors:  Erhan Basad; Bernd Ishaque; Georg Bachmann; Henning Stürz; Jürgen Steinmeyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Augmentation Strategies following the Microfracture Technique for Repair of Focal Chondral Defects.

Authors:  Eric J Strauss; Joseph U Barker; James S Kercher; Brian J Cole; Kai Mithoefer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Gravity-based patterning of osteogenic factors to preserve bone structure after osteochondral injury in a large animal model.

Authors:  Hannah M Zlotnick; Ryan C Locke; Sanjana Hemdev; Brendan D Stoeckl; Sachin Gupta; Ana P Peredo; David R Steinberg; James L Carey; Daeyeon Lee; George R Dodge; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 11.061

2.  Promoting endogenous articular cartilage regeneration using extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  David C Browe; Ross Burdis; Pedro J Díaz-Payno; Fiona E Freeman; Jessica M Nulty; Conor T Buckley; Pieter A J Brama; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Material-Assisted Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair.

Authors:  Constance Lesage; Marianne Lafont; Pierre Guihard; Pierre Weiss; Jérôme Guicheux; Vianney Delplace
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 17.521

4.  Marked differences in local bone remodelling in response to different marrow stimulation techniques in a large animal.

Authors:  H M Zlotnick; R C Locke; B D Stoeckl; J M Patel; S Gupta; K D Browne; J Koh; J L Carey; R L Mauck
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.942

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.