Literature DB >> 16731601

Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane.

L Morawietz1, R-A Classen, J H Schröder, C Dynybil, C Perka, A Skwara, J Neidel, T Gehrke, L Frommelt, T Hansen, M Otto, B Barden, T Aigner, P Stiehl, T Schubert, C Meyer-Scholten, A König, P Ströbel, C P Rader, S Kirschner, F Lintner, W Rüther, I Bos, C Hendrich, J Kriegsmann, V Krenn.   

Abstract

AIMS: The introduction of clearly defined histopathological criteria for a standardised evaluation of the periprosthetic membrane, which can appear in cases of total joint arthroplasty revision surgery.
METHODS: Based on histomorphological criteria, four types of periprosthetic membrane were defined: wear particle induced type (detection of foreign body particles; macrophages and multinucleated giant cells occupy at least 20% of the area; type I); infectious type (granulation tissue with neutrophilic granulocytes, plasma cells and few, if any, wear particles; type II); combined type (aspects of type I and type II occur simultaneously; type III); and indeterminate type (neither criteria for type I nor type II are fulfilled; type IV). The periprosthetic membranes of 370 patients (217 women, 153 men; mean age 67.6 years, mean period until revision surgery 7.4 years) were analysed according to the defined criteria.
RESULTS: Frequency of histopathological membrane types was: type I 54.3%, type II 19.7%, type III 5.4%, type IV 15.4%, and not assessable 5.1%. The mean period between primary arthroplasty and revision surgery was 10.1 years for type I, 3.2 years for type II, 4.5 years for type III and 5.4 years for type IV. The correlation between histopathological and microbiological diagnosis was high (89.7%), and the inter-observer reproducibility sufficient (85%).
CONCLUSION: The classification proposed enables standardised typing of periprosthetic membranes and may serve as a tool for further research on the pathogenesis of the loosening of total joint replacement. The study highlights the importance of non-infectious, non-particle induced loosening of prosthetic devices in orthopaedic surgery (membrane type IV), which was observed in 15.4% of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731601      PMCID: PMC1860400          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2005.027458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  38 in total

1.  Early migration predicts late aseptic failure of hip sockets.

Authors:  M Krismer; B Stöckl; M Fischer; R Bauer; P Mayrhofer; M Ogon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05

2.  Recovery of small colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus following gentamicin bead placement for osteomyelitis.

Authors:  C von Eiff; D Bettin; R A Proctor; B Rolauffs; N Lindner; W Winkelmann; G Peters
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Histologic identification of polyethylene wear debris using Oil Red O stain.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; M Jasty; A Rosenberg; W H Harris
Journal:  J Appl Biomater       Date:  1993

4.  Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings.

Authors:  R M Urban; J J Jacobs; J L Gilbert; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].

Authors:  D C Wirtz; F U Niethard
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

6.  Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements.

Authors:  H G Willert; L G Brobäck; G H Buchhorn; P H Jensen; G Köster; I Lang; P Ochsner; R Schenk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Role of antibiotics in the treatment of infected joint prosthesis].

Authors:  W Zimmerli
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Comparison and quantitation of wear debris of failed total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Hirakawa; T W Bauer; B N Stulberg; A H Wilde
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-06

10.  The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to periimplant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; J J Jacobs; M Tanzer; R M Urban; R Aribindi; D R Sumner; T M Turner; C E Brooks
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  88 in total

1.  Percutaneous interface biopsy in dry-aspiration cases of chronic periprosthetic joint infections: a technique for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism.

Authors:  Pablo Corona; Emilia Gil; Ernesto Guerra; Francisco Soldado; Carles Amat; Xavier Flores; Carles Pigrau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Arthroprosthetic cobaltism and pseudotumour also occur in patients with small diameter femoral ball head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Florian Witt; Turgay Efe; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-28

3.  [Allergic reactions as differential diagnosis for periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  H Meyer; A Krüger; A Roessner; C H Lohmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Wear particles: key to aseptic prosthetic loosening?].

Authors:  M Otto; J Kriegsmann; T Gehrke; S Bertz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  [Histopathologic diagnosis of infectious loosening of joint prostheses].

Authors:  I Bos; M Zagorski; C Boos; S Krüger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  A case series of cementless revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with benzoyl peroxide allergy.

Authors:  Frank S Fröschen; Nadine Gravius; Jan-Frederic Lau; Thomas Martin Randau; Eva Kaup; Max J Friedrich; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Classification of prosthetic loosening and determination of wear particles].

Authors:  M Otto
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  [Histopathological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty : use of a standardized classification system of the periprosthetic interface membrane].

Authors:  M Müller; L Morawietz; O Hasart; P Strube; C Perka; S Tohtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [C-reactive protein. An independent risk factor for the development of infection after primary arthroplasty].

Authors:  T Pfitzner; D Krocker; C Perka; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Viktor Janz; Georgi I Wassilew; Olaf Hasart; Georg Matziolis; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.