Literature DB >> 22420639

Corporate image and public health: an analysis of the Philip Morris, Kraft, and Nestlé websites.

Elizabeth Smith1.   

Abstract

Companies need to maintain a good reputation to do business; however, companies in the infant formula, tobacco, and processed food industries have been identified as promoting disease. Such companies use their websites as a means of promulgating a positive public image, thereby potentially reducing the effectiveness of public health campaigns against the problems they perpetuate. The author examined documents from the websites of Philip Morris, Kraft, and Nestlé for issue framing and analyzed them using Benoit's typology of corporate image repair strategies. All three companies defined the problems they were addressing strategically, minimizing their own responsibility and the consequences of their actions. They proposed solutions that were actions to be taken by others. They also associated themselves with public health organizations. Health advocates should recognize industry attempts to use relationships with health organizations as strategic image repair and reject industry efforts to position themselves as stakeholders in public health problems. Denormalizing industries that are disease vectors, not just their products, may be critical in realizing positive change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420639      PMCID: PMC3362195          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.635776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  36 in total

1.  The theory of "truth": how counterindustry campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens.

Authors:  James C Hershey; Jeff Niederdeppe; W Douglas Evans; James Nonnemaker; Steven Blahut; Debra Holden; Peter Messeri; M Lyndon Haviland
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Kevin C Davis; M Lyndon Haviland; Peter Messeri; Cheryl G Healton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Public health and the anticorporate movement: rationale and recommendations.

Authors:  William H Wiist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Philip Morris' FDA gambit: good for public health?

Authors:  Michael Givel
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 5.  Moving nutrition upstream: the case for reframing obesity.

Authors:  Lori Dorfman; Lawrence Wallack
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Public health campaigns to change industry practices that damage health: an analysis of 12 case studies.

Authors:  Nicholas Freudenberg; Sarah Picard Bradley; Monica Serrano
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2007-12-12

7.  The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Formula labeling violations to the WHO Code: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Ana M Parrilla-Rodríguez; José J Gorrín-Peralta
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.705

Review 9.  Monitoring the tobacco use epidemic IV. The vector: Tobacco industry data sources and recommendations for research and evaluation.

Authors:  Tess Boley Cruz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Shared principles of ethics for infant and young child nutrition in the developing world.

Authors:  Jerome Amir Singh; Abdallah S Daar; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  6 in total

1.  "What Is Our Story?" Philip Morris's Changing Corporate Narrative.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Big Food's Ambivalence: Seeking Profit and Responsibility for Health.

Authors:  Tjidde Tempels; Marcel Verweij; Vincent Blok
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Curating Employee Ethics: Self-Glory Amidst Slow Violence at The China Tobacco Museum.

Authors:  Matthew Kohrman
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Shared vision, shared vulnerability: A content analysis of corporate social responsibility information on tobacco industry websites.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Brie Cadman; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Global prevention and control of NCDs: Limitations of the standard approach.

Authors:  Neil Pearce; Shah Ebrahim; Martin McKee; Peter Lamptey; Mauricio L Barreto; Don Matheson; Helen Walls; Sunia Foliaki; J Jaime Miranda; Oyun Chimeddamba; Luis Garcia-Marcos; Andy Haines; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Cigarette Packs With URLs Leading to Tobacco Company Websites: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin Victoria Weiger; Katherine Smith; Amy Y Hong; Joanna E Cohen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.