Literature DB >> 18950420

Philip Morris's health information web site appears responsible but undermines public health.

Elizabeth A Smith1, Ruth E Malone.   

Abstract

Many people may search for information about tobacco use, the largest cause of preventable mortality in the United States, on the Internet. In 1999, Philip Morris U.S.A. (PM), the country's biggest cigarette manufacturer, posted a Web site and launched a campaign to encourage people to obtain information about tobacco and health issues there. The company asserted that its goal was to deliver the messages of the public health community about tobacco. However, internal tobacco company documents reveal that the site was a public relations effort intended to help the company avoid punishment and regulation. Examination of the language on the Web site reveals many contradictions and omissions that may undermine public health messages. Among these are vague and confusing information about addiction, tar, and nicotine, a lack of motivators to quit smoking, and silence about tobacco-related mortality. By appearing to join with public health organizations in disseminating "responsible" messages about tobacco, PM may improve its image, thus facilitating its ability to continue to sell its lethal products. Public health nurses should be prepared to examine health information on the Internet for subtle biases, to counter PM's specific language about smoking to patients, and to challenge PM's larger corporate goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18950420      PMCID: PMC2794243          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2008.00743.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  33 in total

1.  Reflections on the saga of tar content: why did we measure the wrong thing?

Authors:  N Gray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Internet-based information on alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs: issues of ethics, quality, and accountability.

Authors:  G Monahan; T Colthurst
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 3.  The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact.

Authors:  R W Pollay; T Dewhirst
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Use of health-related information from the Internet by English-speaking patients.

Authors:  Hager Khechine; Daniel Pascot; Pierre Prémont
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  How the health belief model helps the tobacco industry: individuals, choice, and "information".

Authors:  Edith D Balbach; Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Quality of web-based information on pathological gambling.

Authors:  Yasser Khazaal; Anne Chatton; Sophie Cochand; Françoise Jermann; Christian Osiek; Guido Bondolfi; Daniele Zullino
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-03-29

9.  "Creative Solutions": selling cigarettes in a smoke-free world.

Authors:  E A Smith; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Tobacco industry issues management organizations: creating a global corporate network to undermine public health.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Gina Intinarelli; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 4.185

View more
  6 in total

1.  Corporate image and public health: an analysis of the Philip Morris, Kraft, and Nestlé websites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-03-16

2.  Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman; Margaret Debon; G Wayne Talcott; Robert J Vanecek
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-06-15

3.  Financial Conflicts of Interest and Stance on Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yogi H Hendlin; Manali Vora; Jesse Elias; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Shared vision, shared vulnerability: A content analysis of corporate social responsibility information on tobacco industry websites.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Brie Cadman; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  "It doesn't seem to make sense for a company that sells cigarettes to help smokers stop using them": A case study of Philip Morris's involvement in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; E Anne Lown; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cigarette Packs With URLs Leading to Tobacco Company Websites: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin Victoria Weiger; Katherine Smith; Amy Y Hong; Joanna E Cohen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.