Literature DB >> 28236762

Relational vs. attributive interpretation of nominal compounds differentially engages angular gyrus and anterior temporal lobe.

Christine Boylan1, John C Trueswell2, Sharon L Thompson-Schill2.   

Abstract

The angular gyrus (AG) and anterior temporal lobe (ATL) have been found to respond to a number of tasks involving combinatorial processing. In this study, we investigate the conceptual combination of nominal compounds, and ask whether ATL/AG activity is modulated by the type of combinatorial operation applied to a nominal compound. We compare relational and attributive interpretations of nominal compounds and find that ATL and AG both discriminate these two types, but in distinct ways. While right AG demonstrated greater positive task-responsive activity for relational compounds, there was a greater negative deflection in the BOLD response in left AG for relational compounds. In left ATL, we found an earlier peak in subjects' BOLD response curves for attributive interpretations. In other words, we observed dissociations in both AG and ATL between relational and attributive nominal compounds, with regard to magnitude in the former and to timing in the latter. These findings expand on prior studies that posit roles for both AG and ATL in conceptual processing generally, and in conceptual combination specifically, by indicating possible functional specializations of these two regions within a larger conceptual knowledge network.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28236762      PMCID: PMC5810541          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  65 in total

1.  Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Phillip J Holcomb; Tatiana Sitnikova; Douglas Greve; Anders M Dale; David Caplan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Invariant object recognition in the visual system with novel views of 3D objects.

Authors:  Simon M Stringer; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  A time course analysis of enriched composition.

Authors:  Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen; Martin J Pickering; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

Review 4.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.

Authors:  M Beeman; R B Friedman; J Grafman; E Perez; S Diamond; M B Lindsay
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Simple composition: a magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases.

Authors:  Douglas K Bemis; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stimulus-specific suppression preserves information in auditory short-term memory.

Authors:  Annika C Linke; Alejandro Vicente-Grabovetsky; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study.

Authors:  G Bottini; R Corcoran; R Sterzi; E Paulesu; P Schenone; P Scarpa; R S Frackowiak; C D Frith
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Creating Concepts from Converging Features in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Marc N Coutanche; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Neurocognitive insights on conceptual knowledge and its breakdown.

Authors:  Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  9 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of structure and content in sentence comprehension: Evidence from fMRI-constrained MEG.

Authors:  William Matchin; Christian Brodbeck; Christopher Hammerly; Ellen Lau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The Cortical Organization of Syntax.

Authors:  William Matchin; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Feature Uncertainty Predicts Behavioral and Neural Responses to Combined Concepts.

Authors:  Sarah H Solomon; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relational processing in the semantic domain is impaired in medial temporal lobe amnesia.

Authors:  Margaret M Keane; Kathryn Bousquet; Aubrey Wank; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.864

5.  Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Eduardo Europa; David Caplan; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Adult Age Differences in the Use of Conceptual Combination as an Associative Encoding Strategy.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Resh S Gupta; Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Composition within and between Languages in the Bilingual Mind: MEG Evidence from Korean/English Bilinguals.

Authors:  Sarah F Phillips; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-11-03

8.  From letters to composed concepts: A magnetoencephalography study of reading.

Authors:  Graham Flick; Osama Abdullah; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura Giglio; Markus Ostarek; Kirsten Weber; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.