Literature DB >> 16723762

Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling.

Gustaf Ullman1, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, Roger A Hunt, Gudrun Alm Carlsson.   

Abstract

A Monte Carlo based computer model of the x-ray imaging system was used to investigate how various image quality parameters of interest in chest PA radiography and the effective dose E vary with tube voltage (90-150 kV), additional copper filtration (0-0.5 mm), anti-scatter method (grid ratios 8-16 and air gap lengths 20-40 cm) and patient thickness (20-28 cm) in a computed radiography (CR) system. Calculated quantities were normalized to a fixed value of air kerma (5.0 microGy) at the automatic exposure control chambers. Soft-tissue nodules were positioned at different locations in the anatomy and calcifications in the apical region. The signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, of the nodules and the nodule contrast relative to the contrast of bone (C/C(B)) as well as relative to the dynamic range in the image (C(rel)) were used as image quality measures. In all anatomical regions, except in the densest regions in the thickest patients, the air gap technique provides higher SNR and contrast ratios than the grid technique and at a lower effective dose E. Choice of tube voltage depends on whether quantum noise (SNR) or the contrast ratios are most relevant for the diagnostic task. SNR increases with decreasing tube voltage while C/C(B) increases with increasing tube voltage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16723762     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  A method to produce and validate a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for optimisation of chest radiographs acquired with a computed radiography imaging system.

Authors:  C S Moore; G P Liney; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.

Authors:  Chie Kuwahara; Takatoshi Aoki; Nobuhiro Oda; Jun Kawabata; Koichiro Sugimoto; Michiko Kobayashi; Masami Fujii; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Characterization and validation of the thorax phantom Lungman for dose assessment in chest radiography optimization studies.

Authors:  Sunay Rodríguez Pérez; Nicholas William Marshall; Lara Struelens; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-06

4.  Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.

Authors:  Satoshi Takagi; Tatsuya Yaegashi; Masayori Ishikawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Use of a digitally reconstructed radiograph-based computer simulation for the optimisation of chest radiographic techniques for computed radiography imaging systems.

Authors:  C S Moore; G Avery; S Balcam; L Needler; A Swift; A W Beavis; J R Saunderson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Use of a computer simulator to investigate optimized tube voltage for chest imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system.

Authors:  Craig Steven Moore; Tim Wood; Ged Avery; Steve Balcam; Liam Needler; Hiten Joshi; Najeeb Ahmed; John Saunderson; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Optimizing imaging quality and radiation dose by the age-dependent setting of tube voltage in pediatric chest digital radiography.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Wen-Ya Liu; Xiao-Ye He; Xiao-Shan Zhou; Qun-Li Zeng; Bai-Yan Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.