Literature DB >> 22533977

A longitudinal study of speech perception skills and device characteristics of adolescent cochlear implant users.

Elizabeth J Robinson1, Lisa S Davidson, Rosalie M Uchanski, Christine M Brenner, Ann E Geers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users, CI processor technology, map characteristics, and fitting strategies are known to have a substantial impact on speech perception scores at young ages. It is unknown whether these benefits continue over time as these children reach adolescence.
PURPOSE: To document changes in CI technology, map characteristics, and speech perception scores in children between elementary grades and high school, and to describe relations between map characteristics and speech perception scores over time. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A longitudinal design with participants 8-9-yr-old at session 1 and 15-18-yr-old at session 2. STUDY SAMPLE: Participants were 82 adolescents with unilateral CIs, who are a subset of a larger longitudinal study. Mean age at implantation was 3.4 yr (range: 1.7-5.4), and mean duration of device use was 5.5 yr (range: 3.8-7.5) at session 1 and 13.3 yr (range: 10.9-15) at session 2. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Speech perception tests at sessions 1 and 2 were the Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) presented at 70 dB SPL (LNT-70) and Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences in quiet (BKB-Q) presented at 70 dB SPL. At session 2, the LNT was also administered at 50 dB SPL (LNT-50), and BKB sentences were administered in noise with a +10 dB SNR (BKB-N). CI processor technology type and CI map characteristics (coding strategy, number of electrodes, threshold levels, and comfort levels) were obtained at both sessions. Electrical dynamic range was computed, and descriptive statistics, correlations, and repeated-measures ANOVAs were employed.
RESULTS: Participants achieved significantly higher LNT and BKB scores, at 70 dB SPL, at ages 15-18 than at ages 8-9 yr. Forty-two participants had 1-3 electrodes either activated or deactivated in their map between test sessions, and 40 had no change in number of active electrodes (mean change: -0.5; range: -3 to +2). After conversion from arbitrary clinical map units to charge-per-phase in nanocoulombs (nC), no significant difference was found for T levels across time. Average comfort levels (C levels) decreased by 19 nC. Seventy-three participants (89%) upgraded their CI processor technology type. At both sessions, significant correlations were found between electrical dynamic range (EDR) and all speech perception measures except LNT-50 (r range: .31 to .47; p < 0.01). Similarly, significant correlations were also found between C levels and all speech perception measures (r range: .29 to .49; p < 0.01). At session 2, a significant correlation was found between processor technology type and the LNT-50 scores (r = .38; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in speech scores was observed between elementary grades and high school for children who had used a CI since preschool. On average, T levels (nC) and electrode function remained stable for these long-term pediatric users. Analyses of maps did not allow for the determination of the exact cause of C level reductions, though power limitations in new processor systems and changes in perceived loudness over time are possible. Larger EDRs and higher C levels were associated with better speech scores. Newer speech processor technology was associated with better speech scores at a softer level. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533977      PMCID: PMC3403824          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.5.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  24 in total

1.  Changes over time in the psycho-electric parameters in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yael Henkin; Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Chava Muchnik; Jona Kronenberg; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.

Authors:  Yael Henkin; Ricky Kaplan-Neeman; Jona Kronenberg; Lela Migirov; Minka Hildesheimer; Chava Muchnik
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Changes in electrical thresholds over time in young children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear prosthesis.

Authors:  W Shapiro; S Waltzman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

5.  Cochlear implant characteristics and speech perception skills of adolescents with long-term device use.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Christine Brenner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Changes in stimulation levels over time in nucleus 22 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  S L Butts; A V Hodges; S Dolan-Ash; T J Balkany
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

7.  A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M L Hughes; K R Vander Werff; C J Brown; P J Abbas; D M Kelsay; H F Teagle; M W Lowder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.

Authors:  Ann Geers; Chris Brenner; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The effect of instantaneous input dynamic range setting on the speech perception of children with the nucleus 24 implant.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Margaret W Skinner; Beth A Holstad; Beverly T Fears; Marie K Richter; Margaret Matusofsky; Christine Brenner; Timothy Holden; Amy Birath; Jerrica L Kettel; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A Kawano; H L Seldon; G M Clark; R T Ramsden; C H Raine
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.494

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection in normal-hearing and cochlear implanted listeners: effects of hearing mechanism and development.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Park; Jong Ho Won; David L Horn; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20

2.  The Music Experiences and Attitudes Of A First Cohort of Prelingually-Deaf Adolescents and Young Adults CI Recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Rachel See Smith; Christina Scheperle
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

3.  The Estimated Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Listeners Is Different for Early-Implanted Children and Late-Implanted Adults.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Gabrielle O'Brien; Steven M Bierer; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-25

4.  Longitudinal Speech Recognition in Noise in Children: Effects of Hearing Status and Vocabulary.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Caitlin Sapp; Jacob J Oleson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.