Literature DB >> 16717011

Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

A N Healey1, N Sevdalis, C A Vincent.   

Abstract

An observational tool was developed to record distraction and interruption in the operating theatre during surgery. Observed events were assigned to pre-defined categories and rated in relation to the level of team involvement - the sum of which was treated as a measure of intra-operative interference. Many events (0.29 +/- 0.02 per min) were observed and rated in 50 general operations sampled from a single operating theatre. The rating of individual events (r(s) = 0.65) and of cases (r(s) = 0.89) correlated between independent observers. Interference levels (1.04 +/- 0.07/min) also correlated with door opening frequency (0.68 +/- 0.03/min) (r = 0.47, p < 0.001). Some sources of interference were intrinsic to the work of the surgical team, including equipment, procedure and environment, while others were extraneous, including bleepers, phone calls and external staff. The findings highlight the need to further develop measures of interference, to assess its variation, intensity and its effect on surgical team performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16717011     DOI: 10.1080/00140130600568899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  64 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of intraoperative communication in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Helen W L Wong; Sonal Arora; Kamal Nagpal; Andrew Healey; George B Hanna; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical flow disruptions: measurement and impact of stressful events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Robotically assisted laparoscopy benefits surgical performance under stress.

Authors:  Lee J Moore; Mark R Wilson; Elizabeth Waine; John S McGrath; Rich S W Masters; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-08-02

4.  Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery.

Authors:  A N Healey; C P Primus; M Koutantji
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

5.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Mishra; K Catchpole; T Dale; P McCulloch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.

Authors:  K E Hsu; F-Y Man; R A Gizicki; L S Feldman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Immersive training: breaking the bubble and measuring the heat.

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Shabnam Undre; James McDermott; Jasdeep Giddie; Lila Diner; Gillian Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Andreas Müller; Andrea Zupanc; Peter Angerer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure?

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Sonja N Buzink; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.