Literature DB >> 17479324

The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A Mishra1, K Catchpole, T Dale, P McCulloch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence from other professions suggests that training in teamwork and general cognitive abilities, collectively described as non-technical skills, may reduce accidents and errors. The relationship between non-technical teamwork skills and technical errors was studied using a behavioural marker system validated in aviation and adapted for use in surgery.
METHOD: 26 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies were observed. Simultaneous assessments were made of surgical technical errors, by observation clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) task analysis, and non-technical performance, using the surgical NOTECHS behavioural marker system. NOTECHS assesses four categories: (1) leadership and management, (2) teamwork cooperation, (3) problem-solving and decision-making, (4) situation awareness. Each subteam (nurses, surgeons and anaesthetists) was scored separately on each of the four dimensions. Two observers - one surgical trainee and one human factors expert - were used to assess intra-rater reliability.
RESULTS: The mean NOTECHS team score was 35.5 (95% C.I. +/- 1.88). The mean subteam scores for surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses were 13.3 (95% C.I. +/- 0.64), 11.4 (95% C.I. +/- 1.05), and 10.8 (95% C.I. +/- 0.87), respectively, with a significant difference between surgeons and anaesthetists (U = 197, p = 0.009), and surgeons and nurses (U = 0.134, p <or= 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was found to be strong (alpha = 0.88). There were between zero and six technical errors per operation, with a mean of 2.62 (95% C.I. +/- 0.55), which were negatively correlated with the surgeons situational awareness scores (rho = -0.718, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-technical skills are an important component of surgical skill, particularly in relation to the development and maintenance of a surgeon's situational awareness. Experience from other industries suggests that it may be possible to improve the ability of surgeons to manage their own situation awareness, through training, intraoperative briefings and intraoperative workload management. In the future, it may be possible to use non-technical performance as a surrogate measure for technical performance, either for early identification of surgical difficulties, or as a method of evaluation by which non-surgically trained observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17479324     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9346-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

Authors:  C Vincent; G Neale; M Woloshynowych
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

2.  Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices.

Authors:  Lorelei Lingard; Richard Reznick; Sherry Espin; Glenn Regehr; Isabella DeVito
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  A systems approach to surgical safety.

Authors:  J F Calland; S Guerlain; R B Adams; C G Tribble; E Foley; E G Chekan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments.

Authors:  Paul Salmon; Neville Stanton; Guy Walker; Damian Green
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

7.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 8.  The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

10.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  49 in total

1.  Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Erwin Rieder; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Gyusung Lee; O Neely M Panton; Adrian Park; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Quantitative analysis of intraoperative communication in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Helen W L Wong; Sonal Arora; Kamal Nagpal; Andrew Healey; George B Hanna; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Safety in surgery: is selection the missing link?

Authors:  Alistair G Paice; Rajesh Aggarwal; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  New technologies for information retrieval to achieve situational awareness and higher patient safety in the surgical operating room: the MRI institutional approach and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Armin Schneider; Sonja Gillen; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgeons' experience of learning psychological skills: a preliminary evaluation of a psychological skills training course.

Authors:  Victoria Mason; Selina Balloo; Dominic Upton; Kamal Heer; Phil Higton; Uttam Shiralkar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Factors influencing surgeons' intraoperative leadership: video analysis of unanticipated events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sarah Henrickson Parker; Rhona Flin; Aileen McKinley; Steven Yule
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The impact of team familiarity and surgical experience on operative efficiency: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Mahiben Maruthappu; Antoine Duclos; Charlie D Zhou; Stuart R Lipsitz; John Wright; Dennis Orgill; Matthew J Carty
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Effectiveness of a team participation training course for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takahiro Kinoshita; Eiji Kanehira; Minoru Matsuda; Shinichi Okazumi; Ryoji Katoh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Barriers to efficiency in robotic surgery: the resident effect.

Authors:  Monica Jain; Brian T Fry; Luke W Hess; Jennifer T Anger; Bruce L Gewertz; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.