Literature DB >> 17403761

Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery.

A N Healey1, C P Primus, M Koutantji.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To enhance safety in surgery, it is necessary to develop a variety of tools for measuring and evaluating the system of work. One important consideration for safety in any high-risk work is the frequency and effect of distraction and interruption. AIM: To quantify distraction and interruption to the sterile surgical team in urology.
METHODS: Observation of the behaviour of the surgical team and their task activity determined distraction and interruption recorded. Using an ordinal scale, an observer rated each salient distraction or interruption observed in relation to the team's involvement.
RESULTS: The frequency of events and their attached ratings were high, deriving from varying degrees of equipment, procedure and environment problems, telephones, bleepers and conversations. DISCUSSION: With further refinement and testing, this method may be useful for distinguishing ordinal levels of work interference in surgery and helpful in raising awareness of its origin for postoperative surgical team debriefing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403761      PMCID: PMC2653151          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  27 in total

1.  Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice.

Authors:  J R Wilson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Human error: models and management.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

3.  Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"?

Authors:  C D Chisholm; E K Collison; D R Nelson; W H Cordell
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  The human factor in cardiac surgery: errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain.

Authors:  J Carthey; M R de Leval; J T Reason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  A systems approach to surgical safety.

Authors:  J F Calland; S Guerlain; R B Adams; C G Tribble; E Foley; E G Chekan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation.

Authors:  H Singh; L A Petersen; E J Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

7.  Office noise and employee concentration: identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements.

Authors:  S P Banbury; D C Berry
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre.

Authors:  A N Healey; N Sevdalis; C A Vincent
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006 Apr 15-May 15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The effects of stress on surgical performance.

Authors:  Cordula M Wetzel; Roger L Kneebone; Maria Woloshynowych; Debra Nestel; Krishna Moorthy; Jane Kidd; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers.

Authors:  Selwyn O Rogers; Atul A Gawande; Mary Kwaan; Ann Louise Puopolo; Catherine Yoon; Troyen A Brennan; David M Studdert
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  26 in total

1.  Surgical flow disruptions: measurement and impact of stressful events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Shabnam Undre; James McDermott; Jasdeep Giddie; Lila Diner; Gillian Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Counterheroism, common knowledge, and ergonomics: concepts from aviation that could improve patient safety.

Authors:  Geraint H Lewis; Rhema Vaithianathan; Peter M Hockey; Guy Hirst; James P Bagian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Intra-operative disruptions, surgeon's mental workload, and technical performance in a full-scale simulated procedure.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Philipp Stefan; Kamyar Abhari; Patrick Wucherer; Pascal Fallavollita; Marc Lazarovici; Simon Weidert; Ekkehard Euler; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Characterization of device-related interruptions in minimally invasive surgery: need for intraoperative data and effective mitigation strategies.

Authors:  James J Jung; Arash Kashfi; Sahil Sharma; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Noise in the Operating Room Distracts Members of the Surgical Team. An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sandra Keller; Franziska Tschan; Norbert K Semmer; Eliane Holzer; Daniel Candinas; Mark Brink; Guido Beldi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The impact of intra-operative interruptions on surgeons' perceived workload: an observational study in elective general and orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Sophia Antoniadis; Costanza Chiapponi; Christiane Bruns; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Adaptation of a postoperative handoff communication process for children with heart disease: a quantitative study.

Authors:  Jerome Gene Chen; Melanie C Wright; Phillip Brian Smith; James Jaggers; Kshitij P Mistry
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Impaired laparoscopic performance of novice surgeons due to phone call distraction: a single-centre, prospective study.

Authors:  Cui Yang; Julia Heinze; Jens Helmert; Juergen Weitz; Christoph Reissfelder; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure?

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Sonja N Buzink; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.