Literature DB >> 12226770

[Disc replacement with the SB Charité endoposthesis - experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations].

C Hopf1, H Heeckt, C Beske.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Aim of this prospective study was an investigation concerning the indication for the implantation of an artificial disc endoprosthesis and the rating of this operation.
METHOD: 35 patients with 11 bi- and 24 monosegmental implanted disc endoprosthesis were observed over an average follow-up of 14.7 months. Indications for the operation were: unsuccessful, orthopedic conservative treatment > 6 months, segmental pain, age < 45 years, evidence of a radiologic (MRI) demonstrable mono- or bisegmental disc degeneration with or without disc prolabation, exclusion of psychogenic disease and positive preoperative, diagnostic measures.
RESULTS: The average stay in the hospital was 16.8 days (preoperative: 4.3 days), the average operation time 85.5 minutes, the average blood loss was 125 ccm. 23 patients were operated in L 5 / S 1, 20 in L 4 / 5 and 2 in L 3 / 4. NSAR was given in 33 patients preoperatively, opiates in 2 further patients, postoperatively NSAR was necessary in 5 patients, opiates in 2 patients. The preoperative angle of lordosis (L 1 - S 1, n = 25) was changed from 35.6 degrees to 42.6 degrees (20,2 %), the segmental angle from 19 degrees to 30 degrees (57.5 %).
CONCLUSION: The implantation of the artificial disc was followed by a good pain relief in patients suffering from a mono- or bisegmental disc degeneration. In patients with a facett joint arthrosis and elderly patients > 45 years this method cannot be used, the indication in patients with failed back surgery syndrome cannot be estimated yet. Improvements of the instrumentation and the discussion in the case of revisional operations are mandatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226770     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  10 in total

1.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty: indications, biomechanics, types, and radiological criteria].

Authors:  A Baur-Melnyk; C Birkenmaier; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Revision surgery after implantation of a vertebral disc prosthesis].

Authors:  C Hopf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; René Schmidt; Heiko Reichel; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar artificial disc replacement compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population.

Authors:  Wei Ting Lee; Gabriel Liu; Joseph Thambiah; Hee Kit Wong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; René Schmidt; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; Heiko Reichel; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  The future of spine surgery: New horizons in the treatment of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Noojan Kazemi; Laura K Crew; Trent L Tredway
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.