Literature DB >> 12902952

Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year.

Patrick Tropiano1, Russel C Huang, Federico P Girardi, Thierry Marnay.   

Abstract

Total disc replacement has the potential to replace fusion as the gold standard surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. Potential advantages of disc replacement over fusion include avoidance of pseudarthrosis, postoperative orthoses, and junctional degeneration. After observing satisfactory clinical results at 7-11 years' follow-up with the ProDisc first-generation implant, a second-generation prosthesis was designed. This study is a prospective analysis of the early results of total disc replacement with the ProDisc II total disc prosthesis. Fifty-three patients had single-level or multilevel disc replacement and were evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively and at mean 1.4-year follow-up. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in back and leg pain Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry disability scores that were maintained at final follow-up. The clinical results of patients with single- and multilevel surgery were equivalent. Satisfactory results were achieved in 90% of patients who had previous lumbar surgery. Complications occurred in 9% of patients and included vertebral body fracture, transient radicular pain, implant malposition, and transient retrograde ejaculation. Three patients (6%) required reoperation to address complications. No mechanical failure of the implants or loosening was observed, and the prostheses retained motion. Randomized, prospective, long-term studies will be necessary to compare the effectiveness of arthrodesis with total disc replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12902952     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  28 in total

1.  Enhancement of intervertebral disc cell senescence by WNT/β-catenin signaling-induced matrix metalloproteinase expression.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Daisuke Sakai; Makarand V Risbud; Masahiro Tanaka; Fumiyuki Arai; Koichiro Abe; Joji Mochida
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-10

2.  Clinical outcomes after treatment with disc prostheses in three lumbar segments compared to one- or two segments.

Authors:  Svante Berg; Nina Gillberg-Aronsson
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-09-30

3.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty: indications, biomechanics, types, and radiological criteria].

Authors:  A Baur-Melnyk; C Birkenmaier; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.

Authors:  A Nabhan; F Ahlhelm; T Pitzen; W I Steudel; J Jung; K Shariat; O Steimer; F Bachelier; D Pape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.