Balkan Cakir1, Marcus Richter, Wolfram Käfer, Wolfhart Puhl, René Schmidt. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Spinal Cord Injuries, University Hospital Ulm, c/o Rehabilitationskrankenhaus Ulm (RKU), Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081 Ulm, Germany. balkan.cakir@rku.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the goals of total lumbar disc replacement is restoration of the physiological sagittal alignment. There is little evidence if this goal is reached in vivo and further affects the clinical outcome. METHODS: In 29 patients segmental lordosis and total lumbar lordosis were measured on X-rays pre- and postoperatively. The functional outcome was evaluated prospectively with the Visuell Analogue Scale, Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire. FINDINGS: Total disc replacement increased segmental lordosis significantly while total lumbar lordosis remained unchanged. Preoperative segmental/total lumbar lordosis was physiological in 52%/91% of the patients. Postoperatively these values changed to 72% for segmental- and 94% for total lumbar lordosis. No difference could be observed in clinical outcome measures in patients with physiological and unphysiological segmental lordosis. INTERPRETATION: Monosegmental total disc replacement increases the segmental lordosis in most of the cases while preserving the total lumbar lordosis which produces a decrease of lordotic angle in the adjacent segment(s). Although short term clinical results are not affected, the segmental lordosis increase and adjacent segment(s) alteration may influence long term outcome.
BACKGROUND: One of the goals of total lumbar disc replacement is restoration of the physiological sagittal alignment. There is little evidence if this goal is reached in vivo and further affects the clinical outcome. METHODS: In 29 patients segmental lordosis and total lumbar lordosis were measured on X-rays pre- and postoperatively. The functional outcome was evaluated prospectively with the Visuell Analogue Scale, Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire. FINDINGS: Total disc replacement increased segmental lordosis significantly while total lumbar lordosis remained unchanged. Preoperative segmental/total lumbar lordosis was physiological in 52%/91% of the patients. Postoperatively these values changed to 72% for segmental- and 94% for total lumbar lordosis. No difference could be observed in clinical outcome measures in patients with physiological and unphysiological segmental lordosis. INTERPRETATION: Monosegmental total disc replacement increases the segmental lordosis in most of the cases while preserving the total lumbar lordosis which produces a decrease of lordotic angle in the adjacent segment(s). Although short term clinical results are not affected, the segmental lordosis increase and adjacent segment(s) alteration may influence long term outcome.