BACKGROUND:Individuals with cancer receivingchemotherapy suffer deterioration in physical functioning due to symptoms arising from the cancer disease process and its treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine if age, chronic health conditions (comorbidity), stage of cancer, depressive symptomatology, symptom limitations, sex, and site of cancer moderate the effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on physical function and to determine if symptom limitations mediate the effect of the intervention on physical functioning. METHODS:Two hundred thirty-seven individuals with solid tumor cancer (118 experimental and 119 control group) participated in this 10-contact, 18-week randomized control trial. Cognitive behavioral theory guided the nurse-delivered problem-solving experimental intervention. The control group received conventional care. Interviews occurred at baseline and 10, 20, and 32 weeks. RESULTS:Women with breast cancer had significantly better physical functioning than women with lung cancer. Chronic health conditions, symptom limitation, and depressive symptomatology at baseline were found to moderate the effect of intervention on physical function. Symptom limitation, however, was not found to mediate the effect of intervention on physical functioning. DISCUSSION: The intervention was shown to affect physical function trajectories differently for individuals with different personal and health characteristics. Because poor physical functioning is strongly associated with mortality and poor quality of life, this information may be used by health professionals to target interventions to those who might be most responsive.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Individuals with cancer receiving chemotherapy suffer deterioration in physical functioning due to symptoms arising from the cancer disease process and its treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine if age, chronic health conditions (comorbidity), stage of cancer, depressive symptomatology, symptom limitations, sex, and site of cancer moderate the effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on physical function and to determine if symptom limitations mediate the effect of the intervention on physical functioning. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven individuals with solid tumor cancer (118 experimental and 119 control group) participated in this 10-contact, 18-week randomized control trial. Cognitive behavioral theory guided the nurse-delivered problem-solving experimental intervention. The control group received conventional care. Interviews occurred at baseline and 10, 20, and 32 weeks. RESULTS:Women with breast cancer had significantly better physical functioning than women with lung cancer. Chronic health conditions, symptom limitation, and depressive symptomatology at baseline were found to moderate the effect of intervention on physical function. Symptom limitation, however, was not found to mediate the effect of intervention on physical functioning. DISCUSSION: The intervention was shown to affect physical function trajectories differently for individuals with different personal and health characteristics. Because poor physical functioning is strongly associated with mortality and poor quality of life, this information may be used by health professionals to target interventions to those who might be most responsive.
Authors: Donald L Patrick; Sandra L Ferketich; Paul S Frame; Jesse J Harris; Carolyn B Hendricks; Bernard Levin; Michael P Link; Craig Lustig; Joseph McLaughlin; L Douglas Ried; Andrew T Turrisi; Jürgen Unützer; Sally W Vernon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-08-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Anne Moyer; Matthew Goldenberg; Matthew A Hall; Sarah K Knapp-Oliver; Stephanie J Sohl; Elizabeth A Sarma; Stefan Schneider Journal: Behav Med Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.104
Authors: Marc B Feinstein; Paul Krebs; Elliot J Coups; Bernard J Park; Richard M Steingart; Jack Burkhalter; Amy Logue; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Amy J Hoffman; Alexander von Eye; Audrey G Gift; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Marilyn Rothert Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Barbara L Andersen; William B Farrar; Deanna Golden-Kreutz; Charles F Emery; Ronald Glaser; Timothy Crespin; William E Carson Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2007-04-27 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Kathrin Milbury; Gabriel Lopez; Amy Spelman; Christopher Wood; Surena F Matin; Nizar M Tannir; Eric Jonasch; Louis Pisters; Qi Wei; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 3.894