J W Oliver1, R L Kravitz, S H Kaplan, F J Meyers. 1. Department of Medicine and Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, University of California, Davis 95817, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An estimated 42% of cancer patients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: English-speaking cancer patients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, andpain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P =.014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. CONCLUSION: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: An estimated 42% of cancerpatients suffer from poorly controlled pain, in part because of patient-related barriers to pain control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related knowledge among outpatients with cancer-related pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: English-speaking cancerpatients (18 to 75 years old) with moderate pain over the past 2 weeks were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 34) or control group (n = 33). Experimental patients received a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-management, to redress personal misconceptions about pain treatment, and to rehearse an individually scripted patient-physician dialog about pain control. The control group received standardized instruction on controlling pain. Data on average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, and pain-related knowledge were collected at enrollment and 2-week follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences between experimental and control groups in terms of average pain, functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. At follow-up, average pain severity improved significantly more among experimental group patients than among control patients (P =.014). The intervention had no statistically significant impact on functional impairment as a result of pain, pain frequency, or pain-related knowledge. CONCLUSION: Compared with provision of standard educational materials and counseling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-related pain was associated with improvement in average pain levels. Larger studies are needed to validate these effects and elucidate their mechanisms.
Authors: Sandra Ward; Heidi Donovan; Sigridur Gunnarsdottir; Ronald C Serlin; Gary R Shapiro; Susan Hughes Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Sandra E Ward; Ronald C Serlin; Heidi S Donovan; Suzanne W Ameringer; Susan Hughes; Klaren Pe-Romashko; Ko-Kung Wang Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: David Edelman; Eugene Z Oddone; Richard S Liebowitz; William S Yancy; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Samuel D Moon; Amy C Harris; Linda L Smith; Ruth E Quillian-Wolever; Tracy W Gaudet Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard L Street; Christina Slee; Donna K Kalauokalani; Dionne Evans Dean; Daniel J Tancredi; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2009-12-04
Authors: Sara Sanders; Keela A Herr; Perry G Fine; Catherine Fiala; Xiongwen Tang; Chris Forcucci Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Daniel J Tancredi; Richard L Street; Donna Kalauokalani; Tim Grennan; Ted Wun; Christina Slee; Dionne Evans Dean; Linda Lewis; Naomi Saito; Peter Franks Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Evelien H van der Peet; Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; Jacob Patijn; Harry C Schouten; Maarten van Kleef; Annemie M Courtens Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 3.603