Lisa Gallicchio1, Carla Calhoun, Kathy J Helzlsouer. 1. The Prevention and Research Center, The Weinberg Center for Women's Health and Medicine, Mercy Medical Center, 227 St. Paul Place, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA, lgallic@mdmercy.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine differences in physical functioning limitations among African-American and white breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 115 African-American and 712 white breast cancer survivors who responded to a hospital registry-based survey. Physical functioning limitations were assessed using a series of eight questions in which individuals were asked about their ability to perform a physical task such as walking a quarter of a mile. A four-category summary score, representing overall severity of limitation, was created using participant responses to the eight questions. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between race and physical functioning limitation adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In the unadjusted model, the African-American breast cancer survivors were more than twice as likely to have a greater degree of physical functioning limitation compared to their white counterparts (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.59, 3.38). After adjustment for covariates, including body mass index (BMI), the race OR was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.92, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study showed that African-American breast cancer survivors were more likely to have worse physical functioning limitations than their white counterparts; however, much of this disparity was due to racial differences in other variables such as BMI. Future research should focus on effective interventions targeting modifiable risk factors of physical functioning limitations among breast cancer survivors with the goal of improving quality of life.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine differences in physical functioning limitations among African-American and white breast cancer survivors. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 115 African-American and 712 white breast cancer survivors who responded to a hospital registry-based survey. Physical functioning limitations were assessed using a series of eight questions in which individuals were asked about their ability to perform a physical task such as walking a quarter of a mile. A four-category summary score, representing overall severity of limitation, was created using participant responses to the eight questions. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between race and physical functioning limitation adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: In the unadjusted model, the African-American breast cancer survivors were more than twice as likely to have a greater degree of physical functioning limitation compared to their white counterparts (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.59, 3.38). After adjustment for covariates, including body mass index (BMI), the race OR was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.92, 2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study showed that African-American breast cancer survivors were more likely to have worse physical functioning limitations than their white counterparts; however, much of this disparity was due to racial differences in other variables such as BMI. Future research should focus on effective interventions targeting modifiable risk factors of physical functioning limitations among breast cancer survivors with the goal of improving quality of life.
Authors: Carol Sweeney; Kathryn H Schmitz; DeAnn Lazovich; Beth A Virnig; Robert B Wallace; Aaron R Folsom Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Roland J Thorpe; Olivio J Clay; Sarah L Szanton; Jason C Allaire; Keith E Whitfield Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Vera Peuckmann; Ola Ekholm; Niels Kristian Rasmussen; Susanne Møller; Mogens Groenvold; Peer Christiansen; Jørgen Eriksen; Per Sjøgren Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Blythe Ryerson; Edward F Tierney; Theodore J Thompson; Michael M Engelgau; Jing Wang; Edward W Gregg; Linda S Geiss Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lorraine T Dean; Angela DeMichele; Mously LeBlanc; Alisa Stephens-Shields; Susan Q Li; Chris Colameco; Morgan Coursey; Jun J Mao Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Terrance L Albrecht; Tara E Baird; Julie J Ruterbusch; Theresa Hastert; Felicity W K Harper; Michael S Simon; Judith Abrams; Kendra L Schwartz; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rebecca Selove; Maya Foster; Debra Wujcik; Maureen Sanderson; Pamela C Hull; David Shen-Miller; Steven Wolff; Debra Friedman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Amy Leader; Patricia K Bradley; Tiffany Avery; Lorraine T Dean; Melissa DiCarlo; Sarah E Hegarty Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Xin Hu; Puneet K Chehal; Cameron Kaplan; Rebecca A Krukowski; Roy H Lan; Edward Stepanski; Lee Schwartzberg; Gregory Vidal; Ilana Graetz Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01