Literature DB >> 15034743

Sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences towards physiological iron depositions in normal brains at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

T Allkemper1, W Schwindt, D Maintz, W Heindel, B Tombach.   

Abstract

To evaluate the sensitivity of T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences to physiological iron depositions in normal brains at MR imaging field strengths of 1.5 and 3.0 T. T2-weighted FSE sequences acquired at 1.5 and 3.0 T clinical imaging systems (Gyroscan Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) were compared by means of MRI in phantoms ( n=6) and healthy volunteers ( n=10). Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of tubes doped with iron oxides at different concentrations and of brain areas with physiological iron depositions (nucleus ruber, substantia nigra, globus pallidus) were calculated for either field strength. Apparent susceptibility effects of iron-containing brain structures were qualitatively analyzed by comparing the degree of visible hypointensity by a score system at either field strength. The mean CNR of iron oxide tubes and iron-containing brain areas was significantly decreased at 3.0 T. Qualitative analysis confirmed these measurements. Detection and diagnosis of brain disorders with altered iron content such as neurodegenerative parkinsonian disorders (NPD) or intracerebral hemorrhage should benefit from the increased sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences to susceptibility effects at 3.0 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034743     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

Review 1.  First principles of fast spin echo.

Authors:  J Listerud; S Einstein; E Outwater; H Y Kressel
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1992-12

2.  Method for image-based measurement of the reversible and irreversible contribution to the transverse-relaxation rate.

Authors:  J Ma; F W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1996-04

3.  Magnetic susceptibility artifacts on high-resolution MR of the temporal bone.

Authors:  M C Oehler; P Schmalbrock; D Chakeres; S Kurucay
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Assessment of relative brain iron concentrations using T2-weighted and T2*-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  R J Ordidge; J M Gorell; J C Deniau; R A Knight; J A Helpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging in multiple-system atrophy and Parkinson disease: a diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Kirsty Bhattacharya; Daniela Saadia; Barbara Eisenkraft; Melvin Yahr; Warren Olanow; Burton Drayer; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2002-05

6.  Striatonigral degeneration: clinical, MRI, and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  C O'Brien; J H Sung; R E McGeachie; M C Lee
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Brain imaging: reduced sensitivity of RARE-derived techniques to susceptibility effects.

Authors:  P Reimer; T Allkemper; G Schuierer; P E Peters
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Intracranial hemorrhagic lesions: evaluation with spin-echo and gradient-refocused MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  D Seidenwurm; T K Meng; H Kowalski; J C Weinreb; I I Kricheff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Hemi-parkinsonism in multiple system atrophy: a PET and MRI study.

Authors:  A Kume; M Shiratori; A Takahashi; T Kato; K Ito; M Tadokoro; S Sakuma
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  A Schrag; D Kingsley; C Phatouros; C J Mathias; A J Lees; S E Daniel; N P Quinn
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  15 in total

1.  Basal ganglia MR relaxometry in obsessive-compulsive disorder: T2 depends upon age of symptom onset.

Authors:  Stephen Correia; Emily Hubbard; Jason Hassenstab; Agustin Yip; Josef Vymazal; Vit Herynek; Jay Giedd; Dennis L Murphy; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 2.  Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential.

Authors:  Fritz Schick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR liver imaging and cholangiography in the presence of surgical metallic clips at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Brian M Dale; John Thomas; Erik K Paulson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Hyperintense putaminal rim at 3T reflects fewer ferritin deposits in the lateral marginal area of the putamen.

Authors:  S Fujii; E Matsusue; T Kinoshita; S Sugihara; E Ohama; T Ogawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Complete T2-fogging of pontomedullary infarction in Locked-In Syndrome.

Authors:  Simon Nagel; Christian Herweh; Aitziber Bonaut Aleu; Aitziber Aleu Bonaut; Peter D Schellinger; Patricio Mellado
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Adrenal glands in beta-thalassemia major: magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features and correlation with iron stores.

Authors:  Eleni Drakonaki; Olympia Papakonstantinou; Thomas Maris; Artemis Vasiliadou; Alex Papadakis; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Fei Liu; Vasily Yarnykh; Hunter Underhill; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Carotid plaque morphology and composition: initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Hunter R Underhill; Vasily L Yarnykh; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jinnan Wang; Niranjan Balu; Cecil E Hayes; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Dongxiang Xu; Baocheng Chu; Bradley T Wyman; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging of the normal brain: comparisons between under the conditions of 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Sohn; Robert J Sevick; Richard Frayne; Hyuk-Won Chang; Sang-Pyo Kim; Dae-Kwang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.