Literature DB >> 16701361

Genetic compatibility and sexual selection.

Mikael Puurtinen, Tarmo Ketola, Janne S Kotiaho.   

Abstract

Year:  2005        PMID： 16701361     DOI： 10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN： 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Tomas Albrecht; Mark Liu; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Familiarity adds to attractiveness in matters of siskin mate choice.

Authors:  J C Senar; F Mateos-Gonzalez; F Uribe; L Arroyo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic compatibility and hatching success in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus).

Authors:  Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Reed bunting females increase fitness through extra-pair mating with genetically dissimilar males.

Authors:  Stefan M Suter; Martin Keiser; Raoul Feignoux; Dietrich R Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Complex genotype by environment interactions and changing genetic architectures across thermal environments in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus.

Authors:  Magdalena Nystrand; Damian K Dowling; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Moderate multiple parentage and low genetic variation reduces the potential for genetic incompatibility avoidance despite high risk of inbreeding.

Authors:  Cristina Tuni; Sara Goodacre; Jesper Bechsgaard; Trine Bilde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Female rose bitterling prefer MHC-dissimilar males: experimental evidence.

Authors:  Martin Reichard; Rowena Spence; Anna Bryjová; Josef Bryja; Carl Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice.

Authors:  Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Mate choice for genetic compatibility in the house mouse.

Authors:  Anna K Lindholm; Kerstin Musolf; Andrea Weidt; Barbara König
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.912
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.