Literature DB >> 16701277

The evolution of supertrees.

Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds1.   

Abstract

Supertrees result from combining many smaller, overlapping phylogenetic trees into a single, more comprehensive tree. As such, supertree construction is probably as old as the field of systematics itself, and remains our only way of visualizing the Tree of Life as a whole. Over the past decade, supertree construction has gained a more formal, objective footing, and has become an area of active theoretical and practical research. Here, I review the history of the supertree approach, focusing mainly on its current implementation. The supertrees of today represent some of the largest, complete phylogenies available for many groups, but are not without their critics. I conclude by arguing that the ever-growing molecular revolution will result in supertree construction taking on a new role and implementation in the future for analyzing large DNA sequence matrices as part of a divide-and-conquer phylogenetic approach.

Year:  2004        PMID: 16701277     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  74 in total

1.  Genome-scale phylogenetics: inferring the plant tree of life from 18,896 gene trees.

Authors:  J Gordon Burleigh; Mukul S Bansal; Oliver Eulenstein; Stefanie Hartmann; André Wehe; Todd J Vision
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Taxonomy, host-specificity and biogeography of Symmetrovesicula Yamaguti, 1938 (Digenea: Fellodistomidae) from chaetodontids (Teleostei: Perciformes) in the tropical Indo-west Pacific region.

Authors:  Abigail J Downie; Rodney A Bray; Benjamin E H Jones; Thomas H Cribb
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.431

3.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle; Eric Bapteste
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Selecting single-copy nuclear genes for plant phylogenetics: a preliminary analysis for the Senecioneae (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Inés Alvarez; Andrea Costa; Gonzalo Nieto Feliner
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  A hierarchical model for incomplete alignments in phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Fuxia Cheng; Stefanie Hartmann; Mayetri Gupta; Joseph G Ibrahim; Todd J Vision
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  De novo transcriptome sequencing of Momordica cochinchinensis to identify genes involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Hyun; Yeonggil Rim; Hui-Jeong Jang; Cheol Hong Kim; Jongsun Park; Ritesh Kumar; Sunghoon Lee; Byung Chul Kim; Jong Bhak; Binh Nguyen-Quoc; Seon-Won Kim; Sang Yeol Lee; Jae-Yean Kim
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges.

Authors:  Brigitte Marazzi; Judith L Bronstein; Suzanne Koptur
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Prot-SpaM: fast alignment-free phylogeny reconstruction based on whole-proteome sequences.

Authors:  Chris-Andre Leimeister; Jendrik Schellhorn; Svenja Dörrer; Michael Gerth; Christoph Bleidorn; Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.