Literature DB >> 26658292

Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Jack W Oyston1, Martin Hughes2, Sylvain Gerber3, Matthew A Wills4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparity refers to the morphological variation in a sample of taxa, and is distinct from diversity or taxonomic richness. Diversity and disparity are fundamentally decoupled; many groups attain high levels of disparity early in their evolution, while diversity is still comparatively low. Diversity may subsequently increase even in the face of static or declining disparity by increasingly fine sub-division of morphological 'design' space (morphospace). Many animal clades reached high levels of disparity early in their evolution, but there have been few comparable studies of plant clades, despite their profound ecological and evolutionary importance. This study offers a prospective and some preliminary macroevolutionary analyses.
METHODS: Classical morphometric methods are most suitable when there is reasonable conservation of form, but lose traction where morphological differences become greater (e.g. in comparisons across higher taxa). Discrete character matrices offer one means to compare a greater diversity of forms. This study explores morphospaces derived from eight discrete data sets for major plant clades, and discusses their macroevolutionary implications. KEY
RESULTS: Most of the plant clades in this study show initial, high levels of disparity that approach or attain the maximum levels reached subsequently. These plant clades are characterized by an initial phase of evolution during which most regions of their empirical morphospaces are colonized. Angiosperms, palms, pines and ferns show remarkably little variation in disparity through time. Conifers furnish the most marked exception, appearing at relatively low disparity in the latest Carboniferous, before expanding incrementally with the radiation of successive, tightly clustered constituent sub-clades.
CONCLUSIONS: Many cladistic data sets can be repurposed for investigating the morphological disparity of plant clades through time, and offer insights that are complementary to more focused morphometric studies. The unique structural and ecological features of plants make them ideally suited to investigating intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on disparity.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disparity; Embryophyta; angiosperms; clade shapes; conifers; developmental robustness; ferns; macroevolution; morphological diversity; morphospace; species diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26658292      PMCID: PMC4845799          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  102 in total

Review 1.  Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present.

Authors:  J Zachos; M Pagani; L Sloan; E Thomas; K Billups
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Fossil Plants and Global Warming at the Triassic-Jurassic Boundary.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis?

Authors:  M J Donoghue; J A Doyle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals.

Authors:  F G Liu; M M Miyamoto; N P Freire; P Q Ong; M R Tennant; T S Young; K F Gugel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Defining sameness: historical, biological, and generative homology.

Authors:  A B Butler; W M Saidel
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 6.  Origins of flower morphology.

Authors:  P K Endress
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2001-08-15

Review 7.  Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny.

Authors:  K S Renzaglia; D L Nickrent; D J Garbary
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Evolution of leaf-form in land plants linked to atmospheric CO2 decline in the Late Palaeozoic era.

Authors:  D J Beerling; C P Osborne; W G Chaloner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers.

Authors:  L M Bowe; G Coat; C W dePamphilis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Genetic and developmental bases of serial homology in vertebrate limb evolution.

Authors:  I Ruvinsky; J J Gibson-Brown
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  10 in total

1.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  A prescient evolutionary model for genesis, duplication and differentiation of MIR160 homologs in Brassicaceae.

Authors:  Swati Singh; Anandita Singh
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 3.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A combinatorial approach to angiosperm pollen morphology.

Authors:  Luke Mander
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genome diploidization associates with cladogenesis, trait disparity, and plastid gene evolution.

Authors:  Sheng Zuo 左胜; Xinyi Guo 郭新异; Terezie Mandáková; Mark Edginton; Ihsan A Al-Shehbaz; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 8.005

6.  The significance of developmental robustness for species diversity.

Authors:  Rainer Melzer; Günter Theißen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  How (much) do flowers vary? Unbalanced disparity among flower functional modules and a mosaic pattern of morphospace occupation in the order Ericales.

Authors:  Marion Chartier; Stefan Löfstrand; Maria von Balthazar; Sylvain Gerber; Florian Jabbour; Hervé Sauquet; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Signatures of echolocation and dietary ecology in the adaptive evolution of skull shape in bats.

Authors:  Jessica H Arbour; Abigail A Curtis; Sharlene E Santana
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Global patterns and a latitudinal gradient of flower disparity: perspectives from the angiosperm order Ericales.

Authors:  Marion Chartier; Maria von Balthazar; Susanne Sontag; Stefan Löfstrand; Thomas Palme; Florian Jabbour; Hervé Sauquet; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Nested whole-genome duplications coincide with diversification and high morphological disparity in Brassicaceae.

Authors:  Nora Walden; Dmitry A German; Eva M Wolf; Markus Kiefer; Philippe Rigault; Xiao-Chen Huang; Christiane Kiefer; Roswitha Schmickl; Andreas Franzke; Barbara Neuffer; Klaus Mummenhoff; Marcus A Koch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.