Literature DB >> 29900080

BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.

Markus Fleischauer1, Sebastian Böcker1.   

Abstract

Supertree methods enable the reconstruction of large phylogenies. The supertree problem can be formalized in different ways in order to cope with contradictory information in the input. Some supertree methods are based on encoding the input trees in a matrix; other methods try to find minimum cuts in some graph. Recently, we introduced Bad Clade Deletion (BCD) supertrees which combines the graph-based computation of minimum cuts with optimizing a global objective function on the matrix representation of the input trees. The BCD supertree method has guaranteed polynomial running time and is very swift in practice. The quality of reconstructed supertrees was superior to matrix representation with parsimony (MRP) and usually on par with SuperFine for simulated data; but particularly for biological data, quality of BCD supertrees could not keep up with SuperFine supertrees. Here, we present a beam search extension for the BCD algorithm that keeps alive a constant number of partial solutions in each top-down iteration phase. The guaranteed worst-case running time of the new algorithm is still polynomial in the size of the input. We present an exact and a randomized subroutine to generate suboptimal partial solutions. Both beam search approaches consistently improve supertree quality on all evaluated datasets when keeping 25 suboptimal solutions alive. Supertree quality of the BCD Beam Search algorithm is on par with MRP and SuperFine even for biological data. This is the best performance of a polynomial-time supertree algorithm reported so far.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Divide-and-conquer; MRC; Matrix representation with parsimony; Minimum cut; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Split fit; Supermatrix; Supertree

Year:  2018        PMID: 29900080      PMCID: PMC5995099          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  36 in total

1.  Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Lili Yu; Dennis K Pearl; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Conservative supertrees.

Authors:  F R McMorris; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  The evolution of supertrees.

Authors:  Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Minimum-flip supertrees: complexity and algorithms.

Authors:  Duhong Chen; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernandez-Baca; Michael Sanderson
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  SDM: a fast distance-based approach for (super) tree building in phylogenomics.

Authors:  Alexis Criscuolo; Vincent Berry; Emmanuel J P Douzery; Olivier Gascuel
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Majority-rule supertrees.

Authors:  James A Cotton; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  Robinson-Foulds supertrees.

Authors:  Mukul S Bansal; J Gordon Burleigh; Oliver Eulenstein; David Fernández-Baca
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.

Authors:  M Shel Swenson; François Barbançon; Tandy Warnow; C Randal Linder
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.

Authors:  Celine Scornavacca; Vincent Berry; Vincent Lefort; Emmanuel J P Douzery; Vincent Ranwez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  FastRFS: fast and accurate Robinson-Foulds Supertrees using constrained exact optimization.

Authors:  Pranjal Vachaspati; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.