Literature DB >> 20532588

Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses.

Fernanda Bravim1, Fernando L Palhano, A Alberto R Fernandes, Patricia M B Fernandes.   

Abstract

The stress sensitivity of different wild-type strains was evaluated, as well as the response of cells arrested at different cell cycle positions to high hydrostatic pressure (HPP). HHP was chosen both for its importance in food decontamination and assessment of its suitability as a model for stress in general and understanding the yeast stress response. Studies were conducted with four industrial strains and four laboratory wild-type yeast strains (two haploid and two diploid) that differed in their backgrounds. Fundamental differences were found between the laboratory and industrial populations. Industrial strains were clearly more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure and ethanol stresses than the laboratory strains. However, ethanol production was higher in industrial strains than laboratory strains. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between ploidy and stress resistance. Yeast cells arrested in the G1 phase led to an enhancement in pressure tolerance compared to unarrested, G2 arrested, and S arrested cells. Moreover, cells arrested in the S phase were more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure than cells arrested in the G2 phase. Again, industrial strains were more sensitive than laboratory strains. HHP responses of industrial yeasts correlated well with both ethanol concentration and temperature stress, which suggests that it would be a useful model stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532588     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0755-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  47 in total

Review 1.  Structural basis for the interaction of tubulin with proteins and drugs that affect microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  K H Downing
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 2.  The interactions of nucleic acids at elevated hydrostatic pressure.

Authors:  Robert B Macgregor
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2002-03-25

Review 3.  Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity.

Authors:  Simon V Avery
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  How does yeast respond to pressure?

Authors:  P M B Fernandes
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 5.  Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast.

Authors:  P V Attfield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Yeast communities and genetic polymorphism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains associated with artisanal fermentation in Brazil.

Authors:  C Pataro; J B Guerra; M L Petrillo-Peixoto; L C Mendonça-Hagler; V R Linardi; C A Rosa
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 7.  Cold response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new functions for old mechanisms.

Authors:  Jaime Aguilera; Francisca Randez-Gil; Jose Antonio Prieto
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Effect of cell cycle position on thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J Plesset; J R Ludwig; B S Cox; C S McLaughlin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Systematic analysis of HSP gene expression and effects on cell growth and survival at high hydrostatic pressure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Takeshi Miura; Hiroaki Minegishi; Ron Usami; Fumiyoshi Abe
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Stacking of Golgi cisternae in Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires intact microtubules.

Authors:  K Ayscough; N M Hajibagheri; R Watson; G Warren
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  3 in total

1.  High hydrostatic pressure activates transcription factors involved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress tolerance.

Authors:  Fernanda Bravim; Lucas F da Silva; Diego T Souza; Soyeon I Lippman; James R Broach; A Alberto R Fernandes; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.837

2.  High hydrostatic pressure activates gene expression that leads to ethanol production enhancement in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae distillery strain.

Authors:  Fernanda Bravim; Soyeon I Lippman; Lucas F da Silva; Diego T Souza; A Alberto R Fernandes; Claudio A Masuda; James R Broach; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Complete genome sequence and analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain used for sugarcane spirit production.

Authors:  Ane Catarine Tosi Costa; Jacob Hornick; Tathiana Ferreira Sá Antunes; Alexandre Martins Costa Santos; A Alberto R Fernandes; James R Broach; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.476

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.