Literature DB >> 16691346

Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

Daniel Araki Ribeiro1, Mariangela Esther Alencar Marques, Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori.   

Abstract

Glass ionomer cements are widely used in dentistry as restorative materials and adhesives for composite restorations. However, the results of genotoxicity studies using these materials are inconclusive in literature. The goal of this study was to examine the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of three different glass ionomer cements available commercially (Ketac Cem, Ketac Molar and Vitrebond) by the single cell gel (comet) assay and trypan blue exclusion test, respectively. For this, such materials were exposed to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in vitro for 1 h at 37( composite function)C. Data were assessed by Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric test. The results showed that the powder from Ketac Molar displayed genotoxicity only in the maximum concentration evaluated (100 microg/mL). In the same way, the liquid from Vitrebond at 0.1% dilution caused an increase of DNA injury. Significant differences (P<0.05) in cytotoxicity provoked by all powders tested of glass ionomer cements were observed for exposure at 1,000 microg/mL concentration. With respect to liquids of glass ionomer cements evaluated, the major toxic effect on cell viability was produced at 10%, beginning at the dilution of 0.5% for Vitrebond. Taken together, we conclude that some components of glass ionomer cements show both genotoxic and cytotoxic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16691346     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-8931-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  24 in total

1.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop.

Authors:  A Hartmann; E Agurell; C Beevers; S Brendler-Schwaab; B Burlinson; P Clay; A Collins; A Smith; G Speit; V Thybaud; R R Tice
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Genotoxicity of dental materials.

Authors:  J Heil; G Reifferscheid; P Waldmann; G Leyhausen; W Geurtsen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-07-05       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  W Geurtsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.612

4.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells.

Authors:  N P Singh; M T McCoy; R R Tice; E L Schneider
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Genotoxicity of antimicrobial endodontic compounds by single cell gel (comet) assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

Authors:  Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Clarissa Scolastici; Patricia Lepage Alves De Lima; Mariangela Esther Alencar Marques; Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-05

6.  The mutagenic activity of unpolymerized resin monomers in Salmonella typhimurium and V79 cells.

Authors:  H Schweikl; G Schmalz; K Rackebrandt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): a European review.

Authors:  V J McKelvey-Martin; M H Green; P Schmezer; B L Pool-Zobel; M P De Méo; A Collins
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Lack of genotoxicity of formocresol, paramonochlorophenol, and calcium hydroxide on mammalian cells by comet assay.

Authors:  Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Mariângela Esther Alencar Marques; Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Cytotoxicity of liquids and powders of chemically different dental materials evaluated using dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium and neutral red tests.

Authors:  Emma-Christin Lönnroth; Jon Einar Dahl
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Genotoxic effects of chemicals in the single cell gel (SCG) test with human blood cells in relation to the induction of sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE).

Authors:  A Hartmann; G Speit
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity of modified glass ionomer cement on odontoblast cells.

Authors:  Song Chen; Gemma Mestres; Weihua Lan; Wei Xia; Håkan Engqvist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Orthodontic cements induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in mammalian cells in vitro.

Authors:  Fernanda Angelieri; Renata P Joias; Eduardo Bresciani; Juliana Noguti; Daniel A Ribeiro
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-07

3.  Dental methacrylates may exert genotoxic effects via the oxidative induction of DNA double strand breaks and the inhibition of their repair.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Ewelina Synowiec; Justyna Tarnawska; Piotr Czarny; Tomasz Poplawski; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a tooth restoration component, exerts its genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblasts trough methacrylic acid, an immediate product of its degradation.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Tomasz Poplawski; Ewelina Synowiec; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Cezary J Chojnacki; Jan Chojnacki; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by eluates from orthodontic glass ionomer cements in vitro.

Authors:  Fernanda Angelieri; Yuri Slusarenko da Silva; Daniel Araki Ribeiro
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-10-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.