BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Despite its potential for visualizing white matter fiber tracts in vivo, diffusion tensor tractography has found only limited applications in clinical research in which specific anatomic connections between distant regions need to be evaluated. We introduce a robust method for fiber clustering that guides the separation of anatomically distinct fiber tracts and enables further estimation of anatomic connectivity between distant brain regions. METHODS: Line scanning diffusion tensor images (LSDTI) were acquired on a 1.5T magnet. Regions of interest for several anatomically distinct fiber tracts were manually drawn; then, white matter tractography was performed by using the Runge-Kutta method to interpolate paths (fiber traces) following the major directions of diffusion, in which traces were seeded only within the defined regions of interest. Next, a fully automatic procedure was applied to fiber traces, grouping them according to a pairwise similarity function that takes into account the shapes of the fibers and their spatial locations. RESULTS: We demonstrated the ability of the clustering algorithm to separate several fiber tracts which are otherwise difficult to define (left and right fornix, uncinate fasciculus and inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus, and corpus callosum fibers). CONCLUSION: This method successfully delineates fiber tracts that can be further analyzed for clinical research purposes. Hypotheses regarding specific fiber connections and their abnormalities in various neuropsychiatric disorders can now be tested.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Despite its potential for visualizing white matter fiber tracts in vivo, diffusion tensor tractography has found only limited applications in clinical research in which specific anatomic connections between distant regions need to be evaluated. We introduce a robust method for fiber clustering that guides the separation of anatomically distinct fiber tracts and enables further estimation of anatomic connectivity between distant brain regions. METHODS: Line scanning diffusion tensor images (LSDTI) were acquired on a 1.5T magnet. Regions of interest for several anatomically distinct fiber tracts were manually drawn; then, white matter tractography was performed by using the Runge-Kutta method to interpolate paths (fiber traces) following the major directions of diffusion, in which traces were seeded only within the defined regions of interest. Next, a fully automatic procedure was applied to fiber traces, grouping them according to a pairwise similarity function that takes into account the shapes of the fibers and their spatial locations. RESULTS: We demonstrated the ability of the clustering algorithm to separate several fiber tracts which are otherwise difficult to define (left and right fornix, uncinate fasciculus and inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus, and corpus callosum fibers). CONCLUSION: This method successfully delineates fiber tracts that can be further analyzed for clinical research purposes. Hypotheses regarding specific fiber connections and their abnormalities in various neuropsychiatric disorders can now be tested.
Authors: B Stieltjes; W E Kaufmann; P C van Zijl; K Fredericksen; G D Pearlson; M Solaiyappan; S Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Stephan E Maier; Hatsuho Mamata; Melissa Frumin; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: T E Conturo; N F Lori; T S Cull; E Akbudak; A Z Snyder; J S Shimony; R C McKinstry; H Burton; M E Raichle Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-08-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Kubicki; H Park; C F Westin; P G Nestor; R V Mulkern; S E Maier; M Niznikiewicz; E E Connor; J J Levitt; M Frumin; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; R W McCarley; M E Shenton Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-07-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Aristotle N Voineskos; Daniel Felsky; Natasa Kovacevic; Arun K Tiwari; Clement Zai; M Mallar Chakravarty; Nancy J Lobaugh; Martha E Shenton; Tarek K Rajji; Dielle Miranda; Bruce G Pollock; Benoit H Mulsant; Anthony R McIntosh; James L Kennedy Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Yan Jin; Yonggang Shi; Liang Zhan; Boris A Gutman; Greig I de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Margaret J Wright; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Moo K Chung; Nagesh Adluru; Jee Eun Lee; Mariana Lazar; Janet E Lainhart; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2009
Authors: Jungsu S Oh; Marek Kubicki; Gudrun Rosenberger; Sylvain Bouix; James J Levitt; Robert W McCarley; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Martha E Shenton Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Moo K Chung; Nagesh Adluru; Jee Eun Lee; Mariana Lazar; Janet E Lainhart; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Stat Interface Date: 2010 Impact factor: 0.582