Literature DB >> 16686804

Views of older adults on patient participation in medication-related decision making.

Vernee N Belcher1, Terri R Fried, Joseph V Agostini, Mary E Tinetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication decision making is complex, particularly for older patients with multiple conditions for whom benefits may be uncertain and health priorities may be variable. While patient input would seem important in the face of this uncertainty and variability, little is known about older patients' views of involvement in medication decision making.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of older adults regarding participation in medication decision making.
DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one persons at least 65 years old who consumed at least one medication were recruited from 3 senior centers and 4 physicians' offices. APPROACH: One-on-one interviews were conducted to uncover participants' perceptions of medication-related decision making through semistructured, open-ended questions. Themes were compared according to the constant comparative method of analysis.
RESULTS: The predominant theme that emerged was the variability in perceptions concerning whether it was possible or desirable for patients to participate in prescribing decisions. For some participants, involvement was limited to sharing information. Physician and system factors that were felt to facilitate or impede patient participation included communication skills, the expanding number of medications available, multiple physicians prescribing for the same patient, and a focus on treating numbers. Perceived lack of knowledge, low self-efficacy, and fear were the patient factors mentioned. Both the presence and absence of trust in the prescribing physician were seen as alternatively impeding and enhancing patient participation. Only 1 participant explicitly mentioned patient preference, a cornerstone of shared decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: While evolution to greater patient involvement in medication decision making may be possible, and desirable to some older patients, findings suggest that the transition will be challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686804      PMCID: PMC1484726          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00329.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  35 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Leslie R Harrold; Jeffrey Rothschild; Kristin Debellis; Andrew C Seger; Cynthia Cadoret; Leslie S Fish; Lawrence Garber; Michael Kelleher; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Slone survey.

Authors:  David W Kaufman; Judith P Kelly; Lynn Rosenberg; Theresa E Anderson; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Use of medications and polypharmacy are increasing among the elderly.

Authors:  Tarja Linjakumpu; Sirpa Hartikainen; Timo Klaukka; Juha Veijola; Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä; Raimo Isoaho
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Adverse drug events in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi; Saul N Weingart; Joshua Borus; Andrew C Seger; Josh Peterson; Elisabeth Burdick; Diane L Seger; Kirstin Shu; Frank Federico; Lucian L Leape; David W Bates
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Elizabeth H Bradley; Virginia R Towle; Heather Allore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Raburn Mallory; Asefeh Heiat; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Audiey Kao; Alma Kuby; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  85 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Primary Care Physicians' Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Richard F Brown; Michael P Pignone; Scott Ratliff; L Aubree Shay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Nursing Home Stakeholder Views of Resident Involvement in Medical Care Decisions.

Authors:  Theresa J Garcia; Tracie C Harrison; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 4.  Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 1.710

5.  Association between Internet use and decision-making preference in older adults.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Erin Whitehouse; Chakra Budhathoki; Nancy Hodgson
Journal:  Gerontechnology       Date:  2016

6.  A Look at Person- and Family-Centered Care Among Older Adults: Results from a National Survey [corrected].

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  From Bedside to Bench: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Comorbidity and Multiple Morbidity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Cynthia M Boyd; Christine S Ritchie; Edmond F Tipton; Stephanie A Studenski; Darryl Wieland
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Patient preferences for order of the sensory portion of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination.

Authors:  Steven Kirshblum; Michelle Didesch; Amanda Botticello; Bryan Kong; Darine Androwis
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Which providers should communicate which critical information about a new medication? Patient, pharmacist, and physician perspectives.

Authors:  Derjung M Tarn; Debora A Paterniti; Bradley R Williams; Camille S Cipri; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  Difficult to swallow: patient preferences for alternative valproate pharmaceutical formulations.

Authors:  Monali Bhosle; Joshua S Benner; Mitch Dekoven; Jeff Shelton
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.