Literature DB >> 16685568

[Evaluation of individual ceramic implants made of Bioverit with CAD/CAM technology to reconstruct multidimensional craniofacial defects of the human skull].

H Siebert1, P Schleier, J Beinemann, W Fried, W Zenk, D Schumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restrictions in the bone structure of the craniomandibular region caused by malformation, traumata or malignant tumours are currently of interest in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery. Methods of autologous bone transplantation are well established for reconstruction of those defects. The reconstruction and remodeling of contour-shaping defects is more difficult due to atrophy and resorption of free-transplantable tissues. Artificially induced harmful effects have been reported on harvesting in the donor area. Further available methods of alloplastic reconstruction are computer-assisted design and manufacturing systems (CAD/CAM). The advantages of individual design and fabrication are obvious in the manufacturing of defect-specific implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study the application of individual CAD-based reconstructed bioceramic implants made of Bioverit II was evaluated in the region of the facial skull. Clinical results, patient acceptance and the analysis of the postoperative observation period of 30 months are reviewed.
RESULTS: Altogether 25 individual Bioverit ceramics were implanted in the facial region. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic results of the implantations after primary surgery. Three patients developed a need for further correction during the observation period; one implant fracture was observed.
CONCLUSION: Finally, it can be stated that the preoperative expenditures in time, experts, technology and fabrication of individual CAD/CAM planned and manufactured implants are justified by the following advantages: fixed volume, reduced operating time, lack of donor morbidity, easy subsequent treatment of the material and the aesthetic results achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16685568     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-006-0687-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  35 in total

1.  Microsurgical tissue transfer and individual computer-aided designed and manufactured prefabricated titanium implants for complex craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Harald Eufinger; Michael Wehmöller
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Maxillary post-traumatic outcome correction. Literature review and personal experience. Part II: loss of maxillary substance (free grafts of autologous bone).

Authors:  A D'Agostino; A Fior; G Toffanetti; G A Pacino; R Scala; L Trevisiol
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2004-06

3.  Fusion of computed tomography data and optical 3D images of the dentition for streak artefact correction in the simulation of orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  E Nkenke; S Zachow; M Benz; T Maier; K Veit; M Kramer; S Benz; G Häusler; F Wilhelm Neukam; M Lell
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Midfacial reconstruction using calvarial split bone grafts.

Authors:  Wenko Smolka; Nicole Eggensperger; Andrea Kollar; Tateyuki Iizuka
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-02

5.  [Scanning electron microscopy study of cell growth on mechanically produced biovitroceramic and carbon glass in vitro and in vivo].

Authors:  E Beleites; G Neupert; G Augsten; W Vogel; H Schubert
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1985-04

6.  Histomorphometric and densitometric changes in bone volume and structure after avascular bone grafting in the extremely atrophic maxilla.

Authors:  S Schultze-Mosgau; M Keweloh; J Wiltfang; P Kessler; F W Neukam
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  [3-dimensional image acquisition for analysis of primary, cleft-induced facial deformity with an optoelectronic surface scanner].

Authors:  M Krimmel; M Bacher; C P Cornelius; S Schubert; G Göz; S Reinert
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2002-05

8.  Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure.

Authors:  Luigi Chiarini; Sabina Figurelli; Giuseppe Pollastri; Elio Torcia; Francesca Ferrari; Massimo Albanese; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  J E Zins; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Frontoorbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Steven R Buchman; Karin Muraszko
Journal:  Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue.

Authors:  Julia C Vogt; Gudrun Brandes; Ilka Krüger; Peter Behrens; Ingo Nolte; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Stieve
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  [Surgical treatment of vestibular vertigo: methods and indications].

Authors:  M Westhofen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Bone regeneration with glass ceramic implants and calcium phosphate cements in a rabbit cranial defect model.

Authors:  Gerlind Schneider; Karin Blechschmidt; Dirk Linde; Peter Litschko; Thomas Körbs; Eggert Beleites
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Neumann; Kevin Kevenhoerster
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

5.  Biomaterials in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.