Literature DB >> 20859655

Bone regeneration with glass ceramic implants and calcium phosphate cements in a rabbit cranial defect model.

Gerlind Schneider1, Karin Blechschmidt, Dirk Linde, Peter Litschko, Thomas Körbs, Eggert Beleites.   

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite cement (BoneSource®) and brushite calcium phosphate cement (chronOS™ Inject) were tested for fixation of glass ceramic implants (Bioverit®) in experimentally created cranial defects in 24 adult New Zealand White rabbits. Aim of the in vivo study was to assess and compare the biocompatibility and osseointegration of the implanted materials. Macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. All implanted materials were well tolerated by the surrounding tissue. Both bone cements exhibited osteoconductive properties. Differences could be detected regarding to the rates of cement resorption and new bone formation. The brushite cement was resorbed faster than the hydroxyapatite cement. The chronOS™ Inject samples exhibited a higher rate of connective tissue formation and an insufficient osseointegration. BoneSource® was replaced by bone with minimal invasion of connective tissue. New bone formation occurred faster compared to the chronOS™ Inject group. Bioverit® implants fixed with BoneSource® were successfully osseointegrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20859655     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4143-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  21 in total

1.  Future directions in biomaterial implants and tissue engineering.

Authors:  C D Friedman
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun

2.  A 1-year study of hydroxyapatite-derived biomaterials in an adult sheep model: III. Comparison with autogenous bone graft for facial augmentation.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain; Paul A Riordan; Liansheng Song; Marco T Amarante; Behrooz Kalantarian; Paul G Nagy; Charles R Wilson; Jeffrey M Toth; Brian L McIntyre
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Histological and biomechanical studies of two bone colonizable cements in rabbits.

Authors:  J X Lu; I About; G Stephan; P Van Landuyt; J Dejou; M Fiocchi; J Lemaître; J P Proust
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Resorption of, and bone formation from, new beta-tricalcium phosphate-monocalcium phosphate cements: an in vivo study.

Authors:  K Ohura; M Bohner; P Hardouin; J Lemaître; G Pasquier; B Flautre
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-02

5.  [Evaluation of individual ceramic implants made of Bioverit with CAD/CAM technology to reconstruct multidimensional craniofacial defects of the human skull].

Authors:  H Siebert; P Schleier; J Beinemann; W Fried; W Zenk; D Schumann
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-05

6.  A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique.

Authors:  K Donath; G Breuner
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1982-08

7.  [Scanning electron microscopy study of cell growth on mechanically produced biovitroceramic and carbon glass in vitro and in vivo].

Authors:  E Beleites; G Neupert; G Augsten; W Vogel; H Schubert
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1985-04

8.  Biocompatibility and resorption of a brushite calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Felix Theiss; Detlef Apelt; Bastian Brand; Annette Kutter; Katalin Zlinszky; Marc Bohner; Sandro Matter; Christian Frei; Joerg A Auer; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  BoneSource hydroxyapatite cement: a novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Friedman; P D Costantino; S Takagi; L C Chow
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

10.  In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements.

Authors:  D Apelt; F Theiss; A O El-Warrak; K Zlinszky; R Bettschart-Wolfisberger; M Bohner; S Matter; J A Auer; B von Rechenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  6 in total

1.  Self-setting calcium orthophosphate formulations.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-12

2.  Remineralized bone matrix as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Matthew A Soicher; Blaine A Christiansen; Susan M Stover; J Kent Leach; Clare E Yellowley; Leigh G Griffiths; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  A novel injectable borate bioactive glass cement for local delivery of vancomycin to cure osteomyelitis and regenerate bone.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Cunju Zhao; Yifei Gu; Le Li; Hui Wang; Wenhai Huang; Nai Zhou; Deping Wang; Yi Zhu; Jun Xu; Shihua Luo; Changqing Zhang; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  A canine in vitro model for evaluation of marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell-based bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Tanmay P Gharat; Patricia Diaz-Rodriguez; Josh D Erndt-Marino; Andrea Carolina Jimenez Vergara; Dany J Munoz Pinto; Robert N Bearden; Shannon S Huggins; Melissa Grunlan; W Brian Saunders; Mariah S Hahn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Iodine doping of a photocuring, one-component embedding medium for µCT and histology.

Authors:  Gerlind Schneider; Sibylle Voigt; Alexander Alde; Albrecht Berg; Dirk Linde; Katja Otto; Astrid Enkelmann; Matthias Schnabelrauch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shu-Kui Chen; Long Li; Ling Qin; Xin-Luan Wang; Yu-Xiao Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.