Literature DB >> 16678468

How we interact with objects: learning from brain lesions.

Elena Daprati1, Angela Sirigu.   

Abstract

Motor deficits are the most common outcome of brain damage. Although a large part of such disturbances arises from loss of elementary sensorimotor functions, several syndromes cannot be explained purely on these bases. In this article, we briefly describe higher-order motor impairments, with specific attention to the characteristic ability of the human hand to interact with objects and tools. Disruption of this motor skill at several independent levels is used to outline a comprehensive model, in which various current proposals for a modular organization of hand-object interactions can be integrated. In this model, cortical mechanisms related to object interaction are independent from representations of the semantic features of objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678468     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  26 in total

1.  Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Rebeccah-Claire Billing
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Ventral and dorsal fiber systems for imagined and executed movement.

Authors:  Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Dorothee Saur; Michel Rijntjes; Roza Umarova; Philipp Kellmeyer; Susanne Schnell; Volkmar Glauche; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use.

Authors:  Markus Hoeren; Christoph P Kaller; Volkmar Glauche; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Michel Rijntjes; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The context dependence of grasping movements: an evaluation of possible reasons.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Functional connectivity associated with hand shape generation: Imitating novel hand postures and pantomiming tool grips challenge different nodes of a shared neural network.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Amanda Clauwaert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  A brief comparative review of primate posterior parietal cortex: A novel hypothesis on the human toolmaker.

Authors:  S Kastner; Q Chen; S K Jeong; R E B Mruczek
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The representation of tool and non-tool object information in the human intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; Isabell S von Loga; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.