Literature DB >> 16678178

Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos.

Anne Drapkin Lyerly1, Karen Steinhauser, Emily Namey, James A Tulsky, Robert Cook-Deegan, Jeremy Sugarman, David Walmer, Ruth Faden, Edward Wallach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors that affect infertility patients' decision making regarding their cryopreserved embryos.
DESIGN: Forty-six semistructured in-depth interviews of individuals and couples participating in IVF programs.
SETTING: Two major southeastern academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Fifty-three individuals, including 31 women, 8 men, and 7 couples. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts. INTERVENTION (S): None. RESULT(S): Seven broad themes informed participants' decisions about embryo disposition: family and personal issues, trust, definition of the embryo, prospective responsibility to the embryo, responsibility to society, adequacy of information, and lack of acceptable disposition options. Many wished for alternative options, such as a ceremony at the time of disposal or placement of embryos in the woman's body when pregnancy was unlikely. CONCLUSION(S): Recent debates regarding embryo disposition do not reflect the range of values that infertility patients consider when deciding about frozen embryos. In addition to questions about the embryo's moral status, decision making about embryos is informed by a range of factors in the lives of individuals who created them. These perspectives may have important implications for the content and timing of informed consent, facilitating embryo disposition, and advancing policy debates about the ethics of frozen embryo use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16678178     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

1.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Of research and reproduction: defining embryo 'Research' in Canada.

Authors:  Alana Cattapan; Dave Snow
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Decisional conflict and the disposition of frozen embryos: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  A D Lyerly; S Nakagawa; M Kuppermann
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Pregnant Individuals' Views on Fetal Tissue Research in the United States.

Authors:  Natalie C Spach; Elana F Jaffe; Kristen A Sullivan; Ilona T Goldfarb; Jean R Anderson; Jenell Coleman; Sappho Z Gilbert; Marielle S Gross; Lisa Rahangdale; Ruth R Faden; Anne D Lyerly
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Jennifer Harrington; Julia Duff; Matthew Lee; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

Authors:  R Anguzu; R Cusatis; N Fergestrom; A Cooper; K D Schoyer; J B Davis; J Sandlow; K E Flynn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Fertility patients' views about frozen embryo disposition: results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Karen Steinhauser; Corrine Voils; Emily Namey; Carolyn Alexander; Brandon Bankowski; Robert Cook-Deegan; William C Dodson; Elena Gates; Emily S Jungheim; Peter G McGovern; Evan R Myers; Barbara Osborn; William Schlaff; Jeremy Sugarman; James A Tulsky; David Walmer; Ruth R Faden; Edward Wallach
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Ethical and policy issues surrounding the donation of cryopreserved and fresh embryos for human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Cynthia B Cohen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Fresh embryo donation for human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research: the experiences and values of IVF couples asked to be embryo donors.

Authors:  E Haimes; K Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Embryo cryopreservation and utilization in the United States from 2004-2013.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Judy E Stern; Fangbai Sun; Heping Zhang; Aaron K Styer; Wendy Vitek; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.