Literature DB >> 32154565

Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

R Anguzu1, R Cusatis2, N Fergestrom3, A Cooper4, K D Schoyer5, J B Davis6, J Sandlow7, K E Flynn2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are couples' decisional conflicts around family-building approaches before and after seeking a specialty consultation for infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Decisional conflict is high among couples before an initial specialty consultation for infertility; on average, women resolved decisional conflict more quickly than men. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Couples have multiple options for addressing infertility, and decisional conflict may arise due to lack of information, uncertainty about options and potential risks or challenges to personal values. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a total of 385 interviews and 405 surveys for this longitudinal, mixed-methods cohort study of 34 opposite-sex couples who sought a new reproductive specialty consultation (n = 68), who enrolled before the initial consultation and were followed over 12 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: The in-depth, semi-structured interviews included questions about information gathering, deliberation and decision-making, and self-administered surveys included the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), at six time points over 12 months. A DCS total score of 25 is associated with implementing a decision, and higher scores indicate more decisional conflict. A systematic content analysis of interview transcripts identified major themes. Paired t tests identified differences in DCS between women and men within couples. Linear mixed models predicted changes in DCS over time, adjusting for sociodemographic and fertility-related factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The major qualitative themes were communication with partners, feeling supported and/or pressured in decision (s), changing decisions over time and ability to execute a desired decision. Average DCS scores were highest before the initial consultation. Within couples, men had significantly higher decisional conflict than women pre-consultation (48.9 versus 40.2, P = 0.037) and at 2 months (28.9 versus 22.1, P = 0.015), but differences at other time points were not significant. In adjusted models, predicted DCS scores declined over time, with women, on average, reaching the DCS threshold for implementing a decision at 2 months while for men it was not until 4 months. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a convenience sample from a single center, and generalizability may be limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Understanding how couples discuss and make decisions regarding family-building could improve the delivery of patient-centered infertility care. Our findings are the first to prospectively explore decisional conflict at multiple time points in both men and women; the observed gender differences underlie the importance of supporting both partners in clinical decision-making for infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant [R21HD071332], the Research and Education Program Fund, of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment at Medical College of Wisconsin, the National Research Service Award under Grant [T32 HP10030] and the use of REDCap for data collection from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health under Grant through [8UL1TR000055]. The authors have no competing interests.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  couples; decision-making; decisional conflict scale; female; infertility; male; mixed methods; qualitative; reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32154565      PMCID: PMC7105327          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  43 in total

1.  How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics.

Authors:  Dena Shehab; Julia Duff; Lauri A Pasch; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment.

Authors:  L Schmidt; B E Holstein; U Christensen; J Boivin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Gender differences in coping with infertility among couples undergoing counselling for In Vitro Fertilization treatment.

Authors:  A M Pottinger; C McKenzie; J Fredericks; V DaCosta; S Wynter; D Everett; Y Walters
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 4.  Optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff.

Authors:  Sofia Gameiro; Jacky Boivin; Alice Domar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  A S Svanberg; J Boivin; T Bergh
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Partnered Decisions? U.S. Couples and Medical Help-seeking for Infertility.

Authors:  Katherine M Johnson; David R Johnson
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2009-10-01

7.  Differences between husbands' and wives' approach to infertility affect marital communication and adjustment.

Authors:  Lauri A Pasch; Christine Dunkel-Schetter; Andrew Christensen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Addressing decisional conflict about fertility preservation: helping young female cancer survivors' family planning decisions.

Authors:  Madleina Müller; Corinne Urech; Jacky Boivin; Verena Ehrbar; Rebecca Moffat; Rosanna Zanetti Daellenbach; Christoph Rochlitz; Sibil Tschudin
Journal:  BMJ Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2017-11-17

9.  Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Inn Soo Kang; Mi Kyoung Koong; Yoo Shin Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Yubin Lee; Jayeon Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  To preserve or not to preserve: how difficult is the decision about fertility preservation?

Authors:  Jennifer E Mersereau; Linnea R Goodman; Allison M Deal; Jessica R Gorman; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.