Literature DB >> 16675567

Biological characteristics in bladder cancer depend on the type of genetic instability.

Yoshiaki Yamamoto1, Hideyasu Matsuyama, Shigeto Kawauchi, Tomoko Furuya, Xiu Ping Liu, Kenzo Ikemoto, Atsunori Oga, Katsusuke Naito, Kohsuke Sasaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Malignant tumors show an inherent genetic instability that can be classified as microsatellite instability (MSI) or chromosomal instability (CIN). To elucidate the differences in biological characteristics of bladder cancer between the two types of genetic instability, the expression of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, Aurora-A and p53 proteins, the number of centrosomes, numerical aberrations of chromosomes and 20q13, and DNA ploidy were examined in 100 human urothelial carcinomas of the bladder. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Expressions of the MLH1, MSH2, Aurora-A, and p53 proteins and the numbers of centrosomes were immunohistochemically assessed. Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 7, 9, 17, and 20q13 spots were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and DNA ploidy was assessed by laser scanning cytometry.
RESULTS: The expression levels of the MMR related-proteins decreased in 9 of 100 tumors. Tumors with low MLH1 or MSH2 expression (designated as MSI cancers) were not linked with centrosome amplification, Aurora-A overexpression, increased p53 immunoreactivity, 20q13 gain, DNA aneuploidy, and disease progression. MSI cancers showed a favorable prognosis. CIN cancers (49 cases), defined as tumors with a large intercellular variation in centromere copy numbers, were associated more frequently with centrosome amplification, Aurora-A overexpression, increased p53 immunoreactivity, and 20q13 gain than the others (51 cases). Tumors with disease progression were included in the CIN cancer group.
CONCLUSIONS: The present observations suggest that there are differences in the biological characteristics of the two types of genetic instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16675567     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  Aurora A Kinase as a diagnostic urinary marker for urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Michela de Martino; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sebastian L Hofbauer; Ilaria Lucca; Christopher Taus; Helene G Wiener; Andrea Haitel; Martin Susani; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Phase 1 study of MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora A kinase in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  E Claire Dees; Jeffrey R Infante; Roger B Cohen; Bert H O'Neil; Suzanne Jones; Margaret von Mehren; Hadi Danaee; Yih Lee; Jeffrey Ecsedy; Mark Manfredi; Katherine Galvin; Bradley Stringer; Hua Liu; Omar Eton; Howard Fingert; Howard Burris
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Mismatch repair hMSH2, hMLH1, hMSH6 and hPMS2 mRNA expression profiles in precancerous and cancerous urothelium.

Authors:  Dimitra P Vageli; Stavros Giannopoulos; Sotirios G Doukas; Christos Kalaitzis; Stilianos Giannakopoulos; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; George K Koukoulis; Stavros Touloupidis
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Genomic DNA hypomethylation as a biomarker for bladder cancer susceptibility in the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lee E Moore; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Cristina Poscablo; Francisco X Real; Manolis Kogevinas; Debra Silverman; Reina García-Closas; Stephen Chanock; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Mustafa Dosemeci; Montserrat García-Closas; Manel Esteller; Mario Fraga; Nathaniel Rothman; Núria Malats
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Classification of chromosome segregation errors in cancer.

Authors:  David Gisselsson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Elucidation of proliferative capability of mononuclear tetraploid cells, emerging spontaneously from diploid cells, using image cytometry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Hideaki Ito; Atsunori Oga; Tomoko Furuya; Kenzo Ikemoto; Genta Amakawa; Yasuyo Chochi; Shigeto Kawauchi; Kohsuke Sasaki
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Centrosome clustering and cyclin D1 gene amplification in double minutes are common events in chromosomal unstable bladder tumors.

Authors:  Javier Del Rey; Esther Prat; Immaculada Ponsa; Josep Lloreta; Antoni Gelabert; Ferran Algaba; Jordi Camps; Rosa Miró
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Luminal A and luminal B (HER2 negative) subtypes of breast cancer consist of a mixture of tumors with different genotype.

Authors:  Masumi Yanagawa; Kenzo Ikemot; Shigeto Kawauchi; Tomoko Furuya; Shigeru Yamamoto; Masaaki Oka; Atunori Oga; Yukiko Nagashima; Kohsuke Sasaki
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-07-25

Review 10.  Centrosome amplification: a quantifiable cancer cell trait with prognostic value in solid malignancies.

Authors:  Karuna Mittal; Jaspreet Kaur; Meghan Jaczko; Guanhao Wei; Michael S Toss; Emad A Rakha; Emiel Adrianus Maria Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Omer Kucuk; Michelle Dian Reid; Meenakshi V Gupta; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 9.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.